<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Art tells stories, and women’s stories need telling</title> <atom:link href="http://www.aware.org.sg/2010/05/art-tells-stories-and-women%e2%80%99s-stories-need-telling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.aware.org.sg/2010/05/art-tells-stories-and-women%e2%80%99s-stories-need-telling/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:13:05 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: sha najak</title><link>http://www.aware.org.sg/2010/05/art-tells-stories-and-women%e2%80%99s-stories-need-telling/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link> <dc:creator>sha najak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 05:37:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aware.org.sg/?p=5890#comment-1087</guid> <description>similarly, i was disturbed by how hard certain writers wanted to label the show as problematic. and conveniently leave out the overall and broader look of the show. such writers are over-zealous and make use of anti-feminism theories to debunk some artworks without realizing and understanding the processes. wished these writers had put their talent to better use and read more on feminist theory to address the artworks in the show instead of wasting opportunities and strength not to mention being unecessarily heated up, on writing critically well. instead these writers turned out immature and made me think, maybe they are just angry at women and objectify women negatively.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>similarly, i was disturbed by how hard certain writers wanted to label the show as problematic. and conveniently leave out the overall and broader look of the show. such writers are over-zealous and make use of anti-feminism theories to debunk some artworks without realizing and understanding the processes. wished these writers had put their talent to better use and read more on feminist theory to address the artworks in the show instead of wasting opportunities and strength not to mention being unecessarily heated up, on writing critically well. instead these writers turned out immature and made me think, maybe they are just angry at women and objectify women negatively.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ipshita Thakur</title><link>http://www.aware.org.sg/2010/05/art-tells-stories-and-women%e2%80%99s-stories-need-telling/comment-page-1/#comment-1080</link> <dc:creator>Ipshita Thakur</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 09:04:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aware.org.sg/?p=5890#comment-1080</guid> <description>It was rather intriguing to hear all the different responses to Etiquette. What troubled me most was the immediate equation of a show comprising of all women to a stereotypical notion of what kind of art will (or should) be on display.
A certain burden, almost an expectation to be extremely aggressive &amp; to address gender (&amp; nothing else).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was rather intriguing to hear all the different responses to Etiquette. What troubled me most was the immediate equation of a show comprising of all women to a stereotypical notion of what kind of art will (or should) be on display.</p><p>A certain burden, almost an expectation to be extremely aggressive &amp; to address gender (&amp; nothing else).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
