Month: April 2010

Workshop: Manager’s Guide to Harassment

If you are looking for more info on sexual harassment, see here

Dealing With & Preventing Harassment – 17 June

This workshop is now full. We will shortly be announcing dates for future sessions.

Does your organisation have policies and processes for dealing with sexual harassment in the workplace? No? It’s time you did.

The problem of workplace harassment has been in the news recently. Public awareness is growing and more complaints about harassment are surfacing.

Sexual harassment in the workplace affects staff morale, lowers productivity and tarnishes an organisation’s reputation. Having to manage a sexual harassment claim can cost precious time, money and resources.

A recent AWARE survey found that 54% of people had experienced some form of sexual harassment at work. Two thirds of the respondents were not aware of any sexual harassment policies at their workplace.

Learn how you can create a positive, safe and harassment-free workplace at our workshops.

Date: 17 June 2010 (Thursday)Time: 2pm – 5pm

Venue: AWARE Centre (Blk 5 Dover Crescent, #01-22)

Fees:
Single – $100
Pair – $160

Member Discount:
AWARE members who sign-in at the website before purchasing will get a 40% discount off the purchase price. That’s just $60 for the workshop or $96 for a pair. So Bring a Friend.

Course Content

Part I: Understanding Sexual Harassment

  1. Exploring myths and misconception of SH
  2. Definition and key characteristics of SH
  3. Types and Forms
  4. Why SH occurs at the Workplace
  5. Profiles of Harassers and Victims

Part II:

  1. Legal Implication on Employer
  2. Employers’ liability of ignoring SH
  3. Organisation Impact – Real Cost Study
  4. Proactive Stances by HR towards SH
    • Policies
    • Procedure Guidelines
    • SH training for staff
    • How to management the SH investigation with sensitivity
    • Effective and Non Effective Questioning
    • Role Play

This event is designed for senior managers, HR policy-makers, corporate counsel and anyone with an interest in workplace harassment.

For more information, contact Meiling Wong at 6779-7137 or meiling@aware.org.sg

This Session is Now Full.

Time to review the statutory rape laws

Time to review the statutory rape laws

It is time that our laws recognize that all young people need protection from sexual predators, that boys need as much protection as girls.

Existing laws on statutory rape were formulated in the 18th century and are not adapted to a situation in which young girls of 12 years or so are having sex, consensual sex, with boys of the same age (ref ST. 9th Feb 2010).

Laws must protect young people from the sexual predations of adults.

Absolutely. And the rationale behind the development of statutory rape laws was that the power disparity inherent in a relationship between a juvenile and an adult translates into a juvenile’s inability to resist an adult’s coercive influence.

These initial prohibitions were gender specific, restricting only a male’s sexual relations with young females, and were intended to “protect a father’s interest in his daughter’s chastity.” He can then marry her off more easily.

The most historically consistent rationale for statutory rape laws is to protect juveniles, generally from the coerced activity that they are not mature enough to refuse.

But the current reality is that young girls mature earlier than boys of the same age group. They do not live cloistered lives, as they did when the rape laws were introduced in the 18th century Today’s young girls are quite capable of seducing young boys, as evidenced by recent newspaper reports on teenage sexual activities and abortions.

In the 1970s, a new generation of feminists recognized that gender specific statutory rape laws perpetuated negative stereotypes regarding the vulnerability of women. They did not call for  the abolition of statutory rape laws, but instead called for reforms to make the laws gender neutral and thus remove the implication that only females are inherently vulnerable, but rather all juveniles are in need of protection. I think this is a progressive approach and protects both vulnerable girls and boys.

The many laws regulating the sexual conduct of young adult and adolescent peers need to be reformed.

Constance Singam

6th March 2010.

AWARE ED would like to hear from members

Dear AWARE Community,

Warm greetings!

Corinna Lim

I took office as AWARE’s 1st Executive Director (ED) on 1st March 2010 and it has been a whirlwind from the word Go!  No complaints as the activity has been positive and the ED appointment very well received from within and outside AWARE.

March was a particularly active media month for us – 19 appearances, letters and substantive quotes on various topics such as divorce and infidelity, sexual harassment, enforcement of maintenance orders.

Our team at the office is growing as more volunteers join us.  AWARE is blessed to be able to attract highly talented and passionate volunteers and one of my priorities is to set up a Volunteer Management System to optimize this resource. If you have any experience in volunteer management, please contact me.

For my first year, I will focus more on professionalizing our systems and implementing programmes that have already been planned. Concurrently, we will review our current strategy and programmes and start planning for the next three years. I have many questions such as:

a)     What services can we offer to provide more support for women getting back to work or seeking part time work

b)     How can we more effectively use our resources such as our training room which is unused for most of the day

c)     What can we offer to the Dover Community?

d)    Tertiary students and young female adults lack role models. What can we do about this?

e)      How do we engage men in our quest for gender equality? Does the present structure allow this or do we need to make fundamental changes?

I do not have the answers but I know that the answers to these and many other questions lie in community reflection and discussion. I welcome your ideas on the above and anything else that you would like to share with me. Send them to me at  ed@aware.org.sg

I would also love to meet with as many of you as possible. Please make a date to attend the inaugural “Members Meet Up” evening. We will announce details soon.

We are in the process of organizing our most ambitious fund raising event to-date –  Superwomen in Concert featuring Dim Sum Dollies, Rahimah Rahim, Tan Kheng Hua and many other talented female performers.

Please do support us by subscribing to our sponsorship packages (with complimentary VIP tickets), buying SISTIC tickets, volunteering your help or simply spreading the word to your friends.

Hope to see you soon!

Warmest regards.

Corinna

Victims should speak out

If you are looking for more info on sexual harassment, see here

This letter was published in The New Paper on 31st Mar 2010

By Corinna Lim

We refer to your report on the sexual harassment incidents which took place at the YOG’s Chef de Mission Seminar.

The fact that there were quite a few incidents in a short 4 day period indicates that the reported sexual harassment incidents are not uncommon at events like this. This is confirmed by Ms Annabelle Pennefather who also said that she would usually brief and warn her volunteers about such matters.

Workplace sexual harassment (WSH) is prevalent in Singapore but many perpetrators get away with it simply because most victims do not report.

In this case, it is noted that the CEP Champions were not in an employment situation. They were in a project situation and thus did not have as much to lose compared to an employment situation. And that may be why a few of them did speak out.

In TNP’s report on ‘Be my special designer girlfriend’ (23/3/2010) , it was significant that the perpetrator had a record of harassing other staff explicitly, but they all tolerated it as they were in his employment. The whistle blower was someone who had not yet started work yet.

This just goes to show how difficult it is for victims of WSH to report. And if we do not start seriously spreading the message that this really is unacceptable behavior and start taking action against perpetrators, harassment will continue unpunished.

The CEP Champions involved were not shy wall flowers. They were specially chosen for their leadership qualities. Yet, it was clear that they found it hard to really put their foot down in an assertive way. They declined invitations and some walked off, but it seemed that no one actually said “Stop! You are making me uncomfortable or Stop! This is inappropriate behaviour”.  This is the recommended response to put the perpetrator on notice that his actions are not welcomed.

The lack of specific legislation, a code of conduct and a strong culture prohibiting WSH makes it extremely difficult for victims to take more assertive action.

Moving forward, we would urge SYOGOC to:

i)conduct and investigate the various incidents that have been reported, including investigating whether or not any of these incidents involving physical harassment were reported to any officials, and if not, why not;

ii)establish a clear code of conduct for delegates and participants as to what constitutes inappropriate behavior;

iii)train the volunteers on how they should handle such incidents i.e. to Say No! very firmly so that the perpetrator knows that the conduct is unwelcomed; and

iv)establish processes for people to report harassment incidents and for dealing with such incidents.

The woman who went against the norm – in the 4th century

She was the first woman astronomer, and the first woman to make a major contribution to the development of mathematics. But the achievements of Greek philosopher Hypatia were forgotten and buried under the ‘heroics’ of his-story.CONSTANCE SINGAM did some research into Hypatia and tells her story.

The movie Agora, which was screened in Singapore recently, is based on the life of the Greek philosopher Hypatia, a woman whose achievements were forgotten and buried under the ‘heroics’ of his-story. This denial of achievements happens especially to women whose world view and actions challenge dominant cultural norms and political powers

I had never heard of Hypatia and after the movie I did some research and discovered that she was not just a Hollywood fantasy but an actual person, and that in the 1970s the second wave feminists restored Hypatia to her rightful place in history. This is her story.

Hypatia was a woman of grace and eloquence, of beauty and wisdom who lived in the late 4th and early 5th centuries, a time of great change. She was the first woman to make a substantial contribution to the development of mathematics. She was also regarded as the first woman astronomer, an inventor, and a philosophy teacher who specialized in the works of Plato and Aristotle.

Hypatia’s father was Theon of Alexandria, who was a mathematics teacher at the Museum of Alexandria in Egypt. Hypatia became the head of the Neo-Platonist school of philosophy at Alexandria. Her eloquence combined with her remarkable intellectual gifts attracted a large number of pupils and she corresponded with and hosted scholars from other cities.

She became the salaried director of this school in 400AD. She wrote on mathematics, astronomy and philosophy, covering topics such as the motion of the planets, number theory and conic sections. From the little historical information about Hypatia that survives, it appears that she invented the plane astrolabe, the graduated brass hydrometer and the hydroscope, working with Synesius of Greece who was her student and later colleague.

Christianity was becoming a powerful force then and was trying to take control of pagan Alexandria. At that time Alexandria was a centre of Greek intellectual and cultural life, which included many independent schools and the great library of Alexandria where Hypatia was highly influential and a respected scholar and teacher. But it was the wrong place and time for a woman of Hypatia’s calibre as she got caught up in a power struggle between three very powerful men.

Like Hypatia, Orestes, the governor of Alexandria, was a pagan (non-Christian) and one of her students and admirers. Another of her students was Synesius of Cyrene, afterwards bishop of Ptolemais (c. 410) who often consulted her. It is through their letters, which still exist, that we are able to get some sense of her achievements and importance.

Orestes was an adversary of the new Christian bishop, Cyril, a future saint. Cyril objected to Hypatia on a number of counts: She represented heretical teachings, including experimental science and pagan religion. She was an associate of Orestes. And she was a woman, as far as Cyril and his fundamentalist followers were concerned, who didn’t know her place.

Hypatia dressed in the clothing of a scholar or teacher, rather than in women’s clothing. She moved about freely, driving her own chariot. This was not the norm for women then.  She exerted considerable political influence in the city.

It was Cyril’s preaching against Hypatia, according to records, that incited a mob led by fanatical Christian monks in 415 to attack Hypatia as she drove her chariot through Alexandria. They dragged her from her chariot and, according to accounts from that time, stripped off her clothes, killed her, stripped her flesh from her bones, scattered her body parts through the streets, and burned some remaining parts of her body in the library of Caesareum. The movie was less graphic and a little kinder in its depiction of the murder.