Month: September 2011

Helping sex workers, fighting sex trafficking

In 2 separate Roundtable Discussions, experts shared their experiences of combating the prejudice and exploitation that plague the world’s oldest profession.

With all the cultural baggage that surrounds sex work, it can be hard for many people to focus on the ‘work’ part of sex work. But sex workers, like any other wage-earner, also grapple with decisions and concerns about their job-related welfare.

This was the approach social worker Wong Yoke Leng took when she spoke about sex workers in Geylang during AWARE’s August 18 Roundtable Discussion.

Wong works for Project X, which was started in 2008 to improve the welfare of sex workers. Its volunteers work the ground at Geylang to provide assistance to sex workers in need of aid such as subsidies for medical care.

When asked by an audience member during the Roundtable Discussion whether there were any rehabilitation initiatives “to help sex workers return to society”, Wong replied that while such schemes were lacking, “it is also an issue of perseverance and determination – making a career switch would be very, very challenging. I myself have been a social worker for many years and I can’t imagine going into sales”.

She recognised that this sort of empathy with sex workers was rare in most cultures, and that changing mindsets in Singapore will require a great deal more advocacy work.

“We always associate this job with a lack of dignity and morality,” she said. “Once, I tried working with businesses to help give sex workers jobs, but the employers were quite prejudiced and asked me, ‘Do they steal?’ But they’re friends to me, my mentors even, so I don’t see it that way.”

In addition to cultural prejudices, many non-governmental organisations in Singapore also tend to focus on sex workers as victims of sex trafficking.

While acknowledging that trafficking and coercion was a serious problem, Wong pointed out that many of the sex workers she worked with had entered the profession willingly. In any case, “our role at Project X is not to rescue them but to facilitate their needs, such as accompanying them to the Ministry of Manpower or to the clinic if they need to go there”, she said.

Other problems sex workers encounter in Singapore include:

  • Verbal and sexual harassment by members of the public, and the discriminatory attitudes of medical professionals who staff drop-in centres for sex workers.
  • Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common for sex workers in Geylang, as there are few toilets in the area and many do not want to miss out on potential customers by taking bathroom breaks. “This is, in some aspects, worse than STIs because a lot of those can be treated with antibiotics, whereas UTIs lead to daily discomfort,” said Wong.
  • Foreigners who work as sex workers in Singapore may have entered the country on social visit passes or may not have possession of their passports (which are often retained by their pimps). As such, if they are robbed or raped during their stay here, many are afraid to make police reports for fear of being jailed and deported for taking part in sex work. They also have to raise their own money for airfare if they are deported.

The pressing problem of dealing with sex trafficking was then addressed in a separate Roundtable Discussion on August 31.

The speakers were: Noorashikin Abdul Rahman, vice-president of migrant worker rights advocacy group TWC2; and Mark Goh, chairperson of the Archdiocesan Commission For The Pastoral Care Of Migrants And Itinerant People (ACMI).

Goh, a criminal lawyer, pointed out that as the burden of proof in sex trafficking cases lies with the trafficked person, such cases are hard for prosecutors to win because the victim rarely has evidence such as receipts that can definitively prove that she has been coerced or deceived into taking part in sex work.

Because of the evidential burden of mounting a sex trafficking case, prosecutors tend to focus on smaller offences committed by traffickers so they can win their cases. These offences can include forging passports or violating work passes.

This strategy has worrying implications for combating sex trafficking in Singapore. Besides the fact that traffickers get away with lighter sentences, authorities can also point to the low number of official sex trafficking cases as proof that the problem is negligible in Singapore.

Noorashikin pointed out, however, that various research reports have shown that Singapore is a destination for trafficked women brought in from the Philippines, Indonesia, Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia.

That Singapore is a destination rather than a recruitment ground for trafficking is one of the reasons why the government is reluctant to sign regional anti-trafficking treaties.

Said Goh: “The sequencing of trafficking is recruitment, the act itself, and going home. Singapore is in between. If I sign the treaty, what assurance do I have that the other signatory countries will make sure they keep the other parts of the bargain? You can have a lot of laws, but are they enforced? It makes no sense to sign a protocol when your partners are not going to enforce it.”

The pro-business environment in Singapore also means that laws here tend to be biased against victims of sex trafficking.

Noorashikin pointed out, for example, that there are not enough background checks on ‘phantom’ employers applying for work passes that are actually meant for victims of sex trafficking.

“Essentially, trafficking is about exploitation – it benefits businesses and citizens,” she said. “Sex trafficking in Geylang is about providing an outlet. There are 700,000 male migrant workers here with no access to their partners back home, and who not allowed to get married while they are here. Sex workers service this group. Even the British did that in colonial days. The sex work industry also contributes to a more vibrant nightlife, although it is not advertised in official tourism brochures.”

In stark contrast, victims typically have no access to a source of income when they try to mount expensive private prosecution cases against their traffickers, as they are not allowed to work. The victim and the trafficker may even be held in the same location, allowing ample opportunities for intimidation.

In the United States, the government provides victims with not just shelter, but also healthcare, and sometimes even citizenship, said Noorashikin. They can also get monetary compensation, with the money coming from fines collected from prosecuted traffickers.

Such measures may seem far-fetched for Singapore at the moment. “But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t advocate for them,” said Noorashikin.

Find out more about AWARE’s monthly Roundtable Discussions here.

Alamak! Award 2011: The nominees

The results will be announced at AWARE’s Big Ball on October 17, 2011.

We are well into the 21st century and yet we still have remarks, commercials and policies that perpetuate gender stereotypes and sexist attitudes. So AWARE has created the Alamak! Award, an annual search for the most annoying, face palm, gut wrenching, you-have-got-to-be-kidding-me instance of sexism in Singapore.

Here are the nominees for the first Alamak! Award, submitted by members of the public. Nominations were closed on August 31. The voting deadline was extended to Oct 15 from October 7th due to popular demand BUT IS NOW CLOSED.

Here are the nominees:

Obedient Wives Club Singapore

This initiative by the controversial Global Ikhwan group promotes the view that wives should keep their husbands happy in the bedroom by serving them like “a first-class prostitute”, so as to prevent social ills like prostitution, divorce and domestic violence. News that the Obedient Wives Club was setting up a branch in Singapore made international headlines this year. We say that the Club’s distorted and reductive views of marriage and gender roles is socially divisive and dismissive of the real root causes of marital problems.

Read more here.

 

The Singapore Armed Forces’ “Our Army, My Boyfriend” Ad

Sexist stereotypes can alienate both men and women, which leaves this recruitment ad in the unfortunate position of pleasing no one. Featuring a group of women giggling and gushing over their girlfriend’s army scholar boyfriend, this ad annoyed men with its shallow portrayal of the SAF soldier as a trophy boyfriend who, rather implausibly, “always has time” for his adoring partner. And it would take a woman with nerves of steel not to be irritated by the ad’s depiction of women as wide-eyed, simpering bimbos—that cloying chorus of “so sweeeet” alone is enough to turn your stomach.

Watch the ad here.

 

Singapore Airlines’ Employment Policies

It’s a great way to fly—well, perhaps not so much for its female cabin crew. Unlike most other global carriers, SIA’s stewardesses have to resign once they are pregnant unless they can get a ground position, which is difficult to obtain. Steps in the right direction: The airline’s Returning Mothers Scheme, which allows crew to rejoin the company if they meet employment criteria, as well as the initiative announced last year that grants pregnant cabin crew an ex-gratia payment amounting to two months of their basic salary when they resign. But such an exceptional airline and national icon should be held to higher standards of excellence. How about doing away with the automatic termination, paying full maternity benefits, extending the crew members’ flying years and hiring female pilots?

Read more about SIA’s employment policies here, here and here.

 

Great Eastern’s “It’s Great To Be A Woman” campaign

It is great to be a woman. Also great: Great Eastern’s declaration that “we’ve committed ourselves to helping women live well, stay healthy and be empowered”. Not so great: This campaign’s consistent, persistent use of cutesy pastel pink, which seems more infantilizing than empowering. Even less great: Campaign taglines like “It’s great to be a Daddy’s girl. It’s sad to be a Mummy’s boy”; “Discrimination works. Especially on Ladies’ Night”; and “Imagine the fuel we save by asking for directions”. Trading in sexist stereotypes that imply all women relish being coddled like princesses is not only a strange way to convey a message of empowerment, it also has nothing to do with the stated mission of “uplifting womanhood and helping women take charge of their health”.

Visit the website.

 

Desmond Choo, the People’s Action Party’s candidate for Hougang during GE2011

During a rally, the 33-year-old PAP candidate spoke in Teochew of meeting an old man who said that choosing an MP is like choosing a wife. “If your wife is unable to cook, there’s no point. You must choose a wife who is able to do things for you,” Mr Choo quipped, thus delivering arguably the most sexist analogy of the recent General Elections. In the final tally, the first-time candidate received only 35.19 per cent of valid votes. No one can say for sure whether his loss boiled down to his old-fashioned concept of wifely duties, but it certainly didn’t help.

Read more here.

Note: AWARE called for nominations from the public over the last 2 months and these were the names submitted.

AWARE Awards 2011: The nominees

We had such strong nominations for the inaugural AWARE Awards that the judges had a tough time deciding on the short list.

The nominations for Singapore’s first gender equality awards were made by members of the public, as well as members of AWARE.

Each nominee has made a significant contribution to promoting gender equality. For the judges, the key factors for deciding of the shortlist were the effort and impact of the nominee’s contribution and the nominee’s identification with gender equality.

The judging panel comprised: AWARE board member and education entrepreneur Lindy Ong, playwright Eleanor Wong, journalist Ong Soh Chin, academic Philip Holden and ambassador-at-large Professor Tommy Koh.

The winners will be unveiled at our Big Ball fundraising gala on October 17.

SHORTLIST OF NOMINEES FOR THE AWARE HEROINE AWARD

Radha Basu, Senior Correspondent, The Straits Times

Nominated for her tireless pursuit of news stories that raise awareness about issues facing women in Singapore, particularly marginalised and vulnerable groups such as domestic workers and victims of trafficking.

Readers and policy-makers alike have taken notice of her work, which include news articles, features and commentaries that document concerns such as gender equality, fertility, aging, discrimination faced by pregnant women, family violence, human trafficking and gender wage gap.

Jean Chong, Co-Founder, Sayoni

Nominated for representing Singapore women on issues of discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation, including presenting a shadow report on LGBT issues to the UN CEDAW committee.

She co-founded LGBT activism group Sayoni and facilitated projects to give lesbians a voice. These include the publication of the Coming Out Guide for LGBT persons and a bi-annual national survey of queer women.

She was the first chairperson of the Free Community Church, the first LGBT friendly church in Singapore, representing women in the Christian community.

Halimah Yacob, Minister of State, Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS)

Nominated for her leadership and vision as the Director of NTUC’s Women’s Development Secretariat, which provides support to single mothers, lower-income women seeking employment, women rejoining the work force and women seeking leadership in various unions.

As a Member of Parliament, she has been passionate about raising issues that improve the lives of women, including anti-discrimination measures for pregnant female employees, protecting the rights of domestic workers, as well as protection against sexual harassment.

SHORTLIST OF NOMINEES FOR THE AWARE HERO AWARD

Benny Bong, Director, FamilyWorks

Nominated for his sterling work in the prevention of family violence and violence against women, especially in counselling male perpetrators of violence. He has made a significant contribution to policy discussions, training programmes and public education campaigns in this field.

He advocated for criminalising marital rape and has been instrumental in initiating training programmes for police officers on family violence dynamics. He was also the joint organiser of the International Violence Against Women Survey in Singapore in 2009.

Chan Wing Cheong, Associate Professor, NUS Law School

Nominated for his relentless advocacy for gender equality in family and criminal law. He regularly gives talks and writes papers on the subject, including a recent piece on giving homemakers due recognition in family law.

He conducted the International Violence Against Women Survey in 2009 together with Mr Bong. This was the first comprehensive effort of its kind in Singapore. He has also been outspoken about criminalising marital rape in the country.

SHORTLIST OF NOMINEES FOR THE AWARE YOUNG WONDER AWARD

Kwan Jin Yao, 20, Student Activist and Blogger

Nominated for his work in raising awareness and understanding of eating disorders and body image issues. He has organised road shows, exhibitions, workshops, programmes and campaigns such as Food is Not The Enemy (FiNTE), Beauty Redefined and Project WiTHIN to promote self-esteem and healthy eating habits among youth.

These initiatives aim to address significant social issues that contribute to eating disorders, and create a support system for those battling eating disorders.

Nicole Rebecca Seah, 24, Politician and Advertising Executive

Nominated for shattering gender and age barriers by becoming the youngest woman ever to run for Parliament, in the 2011 General Elections. She garnered 43.3 per cent of the vote share in the Marine Parade GRC, as a candidate from the National Solidarity Party.

She is a positive role model for young women and has inspired them to speak up and take a stand for what they believe in.

Jolene Tan, 28, Blogger and Co-Founder, No To Rape campaign

Nominated for her relentless efforts to combat sexism and misogyny in business, media, government and the society at large. She has brought the issue of marital rape to the forefront of public consciousness by co-founding the successful No To Rape campaign.

She also continues to provide a feminist perspective on various issues through her contributions to several sites and blogs such as The F word, a UK-based feminist website. Unlearning patriarchal conditioning and creating female-friendly spaces is her constant endeavour.

Wong Pei Chi, 27, Core Team Member, No To Rape campaign

Nominated for her work in raising awareness on the issue of marital rape through the No To Rape campaign, which collected over 3,600 signatures in a petition that asked the Prime Minister to abolish marital rape immunity in Singapore law.

Driven by a chance conversation with a marital rape survivor, she continues to keep this issue in the public consciousness through discussions with the media, Members of Parliament, community leaders, as well as members of the public.

AWARE Awards 2011: The nominees

We had such strong nominations for the inaugural AWARE Awards that the judges had a tough time deciding on the short list.

The nominations for Singapore’s first gender equality awards were made by members of the public, as well as members of AWARE.

Each nominee has made a significant contribution to promoting gender equality. For the judges, the key factors for deciding of the shortlist were the effort and impact of the nominee’s contribution and the nominee’s identification with gender equality.

The judging panel comprised: AWARE board member and education entrepreneur Lindy Ong, playwright Eleanor Wong, journalist Ong Soh Chin, academic Philip Holden and ambassador-at-large Professor Tommy Koh.

The winners will be unveiled at our Big Ball fundraising gala on October 17.

SHORTLIST OF NOMINEES FOR THE AWARE HEROINE AWARD

Radha Basu, Senior Correspondent, The Straits Times

Nominated for her tireless pursuit of news stories that raise awareness about issues facing women in Singapore, particularly marginalised and vulnerable groups such as domestic workers and victims of trafficking.

Readers and policy-makers alike have taken notice of her work, which include news articles, features and commentaries that document concerns such as gender equality, fertility, aging, discrimination faced by pregnant women, family violence, human trafficking and gender wage gap.

Jean Chong, Co-Founder, Sayoni

Nominated for representing Singapore women on issues of discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation, including presenting a shadow report on LGBT issues to the UN CEDAW committee.

She co-founded LGBT activism group Sayoni and facilitated projects to give lesbians a voice. These include the publication of the Coming Out Guide for LGBT persons and a bi-annual national survey of queer women.

She was the first chairperson of the Free Community Church, the first LGBT friendly church in Singapore, representing women in the Christian community.

Halimah Yacob, Minister of State, Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS)

Nominated for her leadership and vision as the Director ofNTUC’s Women’s Development Secretariat, which provides support to single mothers, lower-income women seeking employment, women rejoining the work force and women seeking leadership in various unions.

As a Member of Parliament, she has been passionate about raising issues that improve the lives of women, including anti-discrimination measures for pregnant female employees, protecting the rights of domestic workers, as well as protection against sexual harassment.

SHORTLIST OF NOMINEES FOR THE AWARE HERO AWARD

Benny Bong, Director, FamilyWorks

Nominated for his sterling work in the prevention of family violence and violence against women, especially in counselling male perpetrators of violence. He has made a significant contribution to policy discussions, training programmes and public education campaigns in this field.

He advocated for criminalising marital rape and has been instrumental in initiating training programmes for police officers on family violence dynamics. He was also the joint organiser of the International Violence Against Women Survey in Singapore in 2009.

Chan Wing Cheong, Associate Professor, NUS Law School

Nominated for his relentless advocacy for gender equality in family and criminal law. He regularly gives talks and writes papers on the subject, including a recent piece on giving homemakers due recognition in family law.

He conducted the International Violence Against Women Survey in 2009 together with Mr Bong. This was the first comprehensive effort of its kind in Singapore. He has also been outspoken about criminalising marital rape in the country.

SHORTLIST OF NOMINEES FOR THE AWARE YOUNG WONDER AWARD

Kwan Jin Yao, 20, Student Activist and Blogger

Nominated for his work in raising awareness and understanding of eating disorders and body image issues. He has organised road shows, exhibitions, workshops, programmes and campaigns such as Food is Not The Enemy (FiNTE), Beauty Redefined and Project WiTHIN to promote self-esteem and healthy eating habits among youth.

These initiatives aim to address significant social issues that contribute to eating disorders, and create a support system for those battling eating disorders.

Nicole Rebecca Seah, 24, Politician and Advertising Executive

Nominated for shattering gender and age barriers by becoming the youngest woman ever to run for Parliament, in the 2011 General Elections. She garnered 43.3 per cent of the vote share in the Marine Parade GRC, as a candidate from the National Solidarity Party.

She is a positive role model for young women and has inspired them to speak up and take a stand for what they believe in.

Jolene Tan, 28, Blogger and Co-Founder, No To Rape campaign

Nominated for her relentless efforts to combat sexism and misogyny in business, media, government and the society at large. She has brought the issue of marital rape to the forefront of public consciousness by co-founding the successful No To Rape campaign.

She also continues to provide a feminist perspective on various issues through her contributions to several sites and blogs such as The F word, a UK-based feminist website. Unlearning patriarchal conditioning and creating female-friendly spaces is her constant endeavour.

Wong Pei Chi, 27, Core Team Member, No To Rape campaign

Nominated for her work in raising awareness on the issue of marital rape through the No To Rape campaign, which collected over 3,600 signatures in a petition that asked the Prime Minister to abolish marital rape immunity in Singapore law.

Driven by a chance conversation with a marital rape survivor, she continues to keep this issue in the public consciousness through discussions with the media, Members of Parliament, community leaders, as well as members of the public.

A step forward: Shaping CEDAW in Singapore

Last Saturday morning, enthusiastic participants gathered at AWARE to attend a public CEDAW Forum. The forum is part of AWARE’s efforts to raise awareness on CEDAW and to encourage everyone to play a bigger role using the CEDAW process to support other women in our country. The forum was graced by AWARE’s President, Ms Nicole Tan, who gave the opening address.

The day started with short presentations from our invited speakers, Ms Kelly Then from LGBT advocacy group Sayoni and Mr John Gee from migrant workers’ rights group TWC2. These speakers shared the main points of their CEDAW Shadow Reports as well as their experiences as participants for the 49th Session of CEDAW at the United Nations.

AWARE’s CEDAW committee member and Vice-President, Ms Halijah Mohamad also talked about the CEDAW Reporting Process and AWARE’s lobbying efforts to raise key issues to the UN CEDAW Committee Members.

After lunch, there was a sharing session on the United Nations’ just-released Concluding Observations (July 2011) on singapore’s compliance with CEDAW. This document highlights the UN CEDAW Committee Members’s concerns on issues such as:

  • The prevalence and persistence of patriarchal attitudes in Singapore
  • The continued prevalence of trafficking of women and girls
  • The lack of statistical data on domestic and sexual violence

The UN CEDAW Committee also made suggestions as to how the Singapore government can enact measures and initiatives to further promote gender equality and protect women’s rights. Some of these suggestions reiterated recommendations rmade by the Committee in previous Concluding Observations (August 2007). This is a clear indicator that the State has not acted upon the Committee’s recommendations.

For example, on the issue of the National Machinery for women, the Committee repeated its 2007 recommendation that the State should elevate the status and strengthen the mandate of the Office of Women’s Development.

Following the session, participants were divided into groups for a short workshop on Moving CEDAW Forward. This is an opportunity for participants to brainstorm ideas that will make CEDAW more accessible to all.

Each group had a different topic to discuss:

  • Group 1: Public education on CEDAW
  • Group 2: Outreach
  • Group 3: Identifying the top 3 issues for research and advocacy
  • Group 4: How to form a CEDAW coalition?

Each group came back with great ideas. Group 1 suggested we conduct talks on CEDAW in schools and universities. Group 2 suggesting that we set-up creative productions on CEDAW, while Group 3 identified the need to increase political participation of women. Group 4 suggested establishing a secretariat for CEDAW.

It was heartening and inspiring to see participants actively engaging with CEDAW. We hope that everyone who attended gained a better understanding of CEDAW and walked away with new insights and perspectives on the Convention.

Our response to “A PhD’s fine, but what about love and babies?”

AWARE’s Letter to the Straits Times Forum Page, published September 13, 2011

The stark choice between motherhood and professional advancement presented in Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s comments to Ms Joan Sim is not new (‘A PhD’s fine, but what about love and babies?’, Straits Times, Sept 6, 2011).

In 1983, he said: ‘We shouldn’t get our women into jobs where they cannot, at the same time, be mothers.’ In 1994, he said that ‘attractive and intelligent young ladies’ should go to finishing colleges so that they will be ‘marvellous helpers of their husband’s career’. And now, Ms Sim has been advised to stop wasting time on her doctorate and find a boyfriend instead.

These views contradict the recent statements by Minister of State for Community Development, Youth and Sports Halimah Yacob to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) that gender equality is central to Singapore’s socio-economic growth and that ‘maximising the full potential of every individual, male or female, is a priority’.

Under CEDAW, the Government is obliged to ‘take appropriate measures to modify the social and cultural patterns of the conduct of men and women based on the idea of stereotypical roles of men and women’. However, state policies have not kept pace with social developments and changing gender roles.

Fathers are not entitled to paid paternity leave, reinforcing the social expectation that mothers should bear most of the caregiving responsibilities. Flexible working arrangements attractive to mothers of young children are not widely available. Infant care facilities are inadequate for the country’s needs.

Such policies make raising children a daunting prospect for working women who want to continue their careers after becoming mothers. The State should take the lead in making family a more attractive option for these women, starting with a change of governmental attitude and the policies stated above.

The Scandinavian countries have shown that appropriate state policies that counter social norms can reverse declining fertility rates.

Public statements made by influential figures like Mr Lee are also important to shaping social attitudes.

Remarks that imply that women belong at home and men should be primarily providers undermine the efforts of men and women who struggle every day to meet the demands of family and working life.

Implying that marriage and motherhood are more important than education and work belittles the choices and contributions of women who prefer to be single or childless.

Such comments also perpetuate sexist stereotypes for a younger generation.

Nicole Tan
President, Association Of Women For Action & Research (AWARE)

Read the published letter here.