Year: 2010

How Harassment Hurts

If you are looking for more info on sexual harassment, see here

The emotional and psychological scars of sexual harassment run deep. One victim, Tessa* reveals her struggle to cope and how she contemplated suicide after two incidents of harassment.

“Imagine talking to people whom you think you can trust. You feel dirty, and the days are passing by in a surreal haze. They tell you, do not be angry, do not be upset. Think positive! Nothing bad will happen; you are just being symptomatic, and your fear and anger are indicative of that,” Tessa tells AWARE what people told her, conveying the difficulty she faced when everyone around her told her the harassment was all in her head, and she was making a big deal of nothing.

“They told me I do not need to take any extra measures to keep myself safe,” Tessa continues. “And to just go back to living life like I had, previously. Only things would never be the same again.”

Tessa was harassed by two different men, both of whom propositioned her for sex.  In the first incident, the man threatened to rape her. In the second, another harrassed her verbally, even though she outright rejected his advances and was clearly uncomfortable with the situation. The harassment incidents occurred within four months.

Tessa was told over and over that the two men did nothing to her; and that she was making a mountain out of a molehill. That if she went to the police, they couldn’t do anything anyway. Here, in her own words, Tessa tells AWARE how she found her way through a very dark time.

***

I thought that nobody understood me. I even stopped talking to my doctor. He referred me to a psychologist, who, too, was at a loss as to with what to do with me. In the psychologist’s opinion, I had no reason to be traumatised. I continued to get worse. I was cheered when I saw the her taking notes diligently while I told her my story. But after summarising the main points, she disposed of her handwritten notes. I was devastated —I thought that her notes could be a record of events that I could use to protect myself if the necessity came up, but now that the notes were gone…

I blamed myself for the harassment, and hated myself for it. I felt like a shell; and as though my body had been objectified for the pleasure of men. I would hide, I reassured myself. I would hide myself so that they wouldn’t be able to find me. I would hide myself so that I would be safe. I became depressed.

Four months in, I resolved to kill myself. My world had shrunk to days spent absently staring out into space or watching television. I could hardly string sentences together. I was failing at a job that I had so prized just a couple of months back. My depression had dragged on for months, and the end was nowhere in sight. I could only see myself being a burden to others, and taking my own life seemed like the best option at the time. And so, one night in July, I attempted to take my own life.

I was lucky. I survived. But I was far from healed. One day, I made an appointment to see another psychologist. During the first session, I once again related the events that had brought me to his office. I thought that he would, like all the others, tell me that I was making a big deal about nothing. I braced myself, fully expecting that he would just dismiss my pain. Thankfully he was different.

“Tessa, do you know what this is?” he asked me. This is sexual harassment. You can report them to the police.” I can still remember the indignation in his voice with absolute clarity and the directness of his gaze as he said it.

Caught completely off guard, I sat in silence while I absorbed the implications of his statement. In my mind, there was a growing buzz: You mean—you mean I have a right to be angry? You mean they had no right to do that to me? You mean people will support me if they ever act on their words.

It was with those words that I slowly started the process of healing. I had a right to feel angry with them, dislike them for what they had done to me. I was not, as the psychiatrist had asserted, narrow-minded. I was simply traumatised…

The entire experience taught me that sexual harassment is not acceptable, and no one should be made to feel that being treated this way is all right.  Women like me have a right to feel violated after being sexually harassed.

Looking back now, I understand first-hand why it’s so important to raise awareness of the problem of sexual harassment and changing society’s attitudes towards it. Advocacy like this really does have the ability to save lives.  I know it certainly saved mine.

*Not her real name. Published with permission.

Victims and friends of victims of sexual assault are encouraged to call AWARE’s Helpline at 1800 777 5555. We have a team of experienced counsellors and legal advisers to assist in and advise, and provide a listening ear.

From Cyberstalking to Up-skirting – 10 Tech Scams You Should Know About

Robin Rheaume

Yup – it is a scary world sometimes. Smart phones and social networking can be fun but you need to be street smart about the brave new world of instant information.

Technology gives scammers and harassers more ways to find their way into your life. And while some risk are gender neutral, in many cases, women are specifically targeted – be it for romance scams, or sexually related blackmail.

These are the risks your mother never told you about…

There are broadly two categories of risks: (1) those that involve using and abusing technology in threatening ways and (2) those that use the internet to try scam you out of money or information.

Misuse of Technology

The ease with which photos can be taken, copied and transmitted makes them highly susceptible to misuse.

1. Hidden webcams in your residence

Shocking but it happens (yes even in Singapore). Your landlord (or someone else) may have hidden webcams in your flat … and it may or may not be illegal depending on:

  1. Where are the cameras installed? Are they in a common area or in the bathroom?
  2. Are you renting a room or the entire flat? – the landlord may be allowed to put cameras in common areas which you are not renting

If you find yourself in this situation, insist that the webcam owner immediately removed the cameras… and consider looking for a new place to live where you will feel safer. Consult a lawyer to find out what legal options may be available.

2. Blackmail with naked photos/video

Of course it goes without saying that it is NOT A GOOD IDEA to let anyone take naked photos of you unless you are prepared to have them released into cyberspace! But whether the blackmailer actually took a picture of you naked or not, he could say he did while you were sleeping (say if it was an ex).

The young woman contacted police on Tuesday, telling them she had received a number of text messages from an unknown mobile phone number demanding $5,000, or photographs of her naked would be posted online. She had also discovered that her image had been used to advertise sex on a website. – Straits Times July 2010

Police have noted a new crime trend where Internet users are propositioned by perpetrators whom had befriended them online to perform sexual acts in front of a webcam, and thereafter extorted by the perpetrator who would threaten to circulate compromising photos and videos of the victim. – Singapore Police September 2010

Note: Blackmail (“Putting A Person In Fear In Order To Commit Extortion”) is illegal in Singapore so you may refer the matter to the police.

3. Upskirting: taking a photo up a woman’s skirt

It just takes a second and it can happen just about anywhere: in the MRT, in a lift, standing at a crosswalk… we’ve even heard stories of students doing it to their teachers in class.

What should you do? Start by grabbing the perpetrator’s phone and yelling at him in public! Make sure he is so embarrassed it never happens again.

4. Cyberstalking & Harassment

Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass a person or group. This can take many forms ranging from bullying between children to harassment of adults. The harasser can be a schoolmate, a colleague or even a member of your family. The bully, whether age 8 or 80, may make use of SMS, online chat, blogs and social networking sites like Facebook.

Cyberstalking can have serious repercussions: victims can become depressed and there have been countless cases where this has led to suicide. It’s not a joke. There are no laws in Singapore which specifically address harassment by electronic means however the stalker may be guilty of criminal intimidation. Check out the Singapore site Don’t Cyber Bully for more info.

If you are being harassed then (1) do NOT reply to the harasser – you may provoke a “flame war” which will only make matters worse, but (2) do NOT delete the messages – you may need them as evidence. (3) Collect evidence by taking note of URLs and taking screen shots of abusive messages. (4) When the abuse is taking place on a website, report the abuse to the website manager. (5) Put filters in place for email from the harasser. (6) If you are feeling depressed about the situation, get in touch with a counsellor… and (7) if you are feeling threatened, consider reporting the harassment to the authorities.

Online Scams

Most scams are simple attempts to dupe you out of cash and are usually transparent to a seasoned internet user:

  • “Hi! I’m from Nigeria and I can send you 1 million dollars if you just send me a bit of money first!”
  • This is your bank: please send us your password for security purposes!
  • I’m from Russia and I want to sell you this iPad for just $50! Really! eBay A+++!

Sure you can spot them… but some scams are a bit more sophisticated:

5. Romance Scams

 

The perpetrators trawl chat rooms and other social media looking for lonely hearts to befriend. These charlatans are repeatedly successful at conning their online sweethearts out of thousands of dollars. Often the victims will not report the crime because they feel foolish.

He told me that we could only be together after he had completed his divorce proceedings. His wife lived back in LA and he couldn’t afford the flight back. So I paid for his flight. Then when he got to LA he said he lost his wallet so I sent him a bit more… in all I sent him over $10,000 but then never heard from him again.*

These con artists can be very persuasive. They will send photos of themselves which make them look kind and attractive (the photos are just stolen off the net).

Some scammers even target gay people in particular because they know many will be too afraid to out themselves by going to the police.

* Told to the author by a personal friend. The money was never recovered.

6. Modelling & Acting Job Scams

These scams come in two flavours:

  1. A scammer poses as an acting or modelling agent in order to find talent. He then offers to meet the aspiring model/actor in order to “coach” her to get a job. The victim is lured to a remote location and molested under the guise of giving tips in order to pass a modelling interview. The victim may be too intimidated to report the matter to authorities.
  2. An “agency” offers a modelling job for quick money. After many promises are made, the aspiring model is eventually asked to pay some kind of registration fee or advance payment for a photo session. Then *poof* the agency disappears! Aspiring writers and other artists may be targeted by variations of these scams.
Don’t ever agree to meet someone
off the internet who is a stranger.

Always set meetings in a public place in the company of a trusted friend.

If you have already been tricked do not be ashamed. These men and women can be very convincing and they often have a lot of experience conning people. Report the matter to authorities! These criminals will keep doing the same thing to others until they are stopped.

And remember that any offer on the internet that appears too good to be true probably is.

7. “You can be Famous!”

There are a number of companies that produce books and/or videos which they claim feature the most important people in their respective industries.

Congratulations! You have been selected to be in our prestigious publication!

You receive a notice saying you have been selected… but you must, of course, pay a registration fee! Similarly, you may find you have been selected to be “part of a documentary production” but again must make advance payment in order to be featured.

This is not strictly illegal if they do produce the publication promised… but what is produced may be no better than a few photocopied pages bound together… and they will probably encourage you to buy copies for yet more money!

8. Work at Home Scams

A company offers the potential to make a huge income from working at home without any experience… but eventually you are asked to pay a fee for registration or training materials. Don’t hold your breath for that first pay check because… it is NOT coming!

9. Buying & Selling Online

Buying
Was the internet invented just to distribute porn and steal credit card numbers? Some times it seems so. But what can an earnest shopper do to protect herself?

NEVER give you credit card information
to any firm with a dubious/unknown reputation.

NEVER give you credit card information to any firm with a dubious/unknown reputation. Even if the company itself seems legitimate but perhaps small or unprofessional, if they do not have strong data protection, their system could get hacked in to and your credit card details revealed.

  • Only deal with well regarded / well established companies, and
  • Keep one credit card with a LOW credit limit exclusively for online shopping. Do not use any of your other cards online.

Selling
Even selling items online (like through eBay) where you are receiving cash can be dangerous: once the item has been sent, the buyer can tell PayPal it was faulty and ask for their money back. Don’t count on protection from eBay or PayPal in these situations.

  • SHOP LOCAL! It is always preferable to deal with a local seller/buyer than an international one as payment is usually via the local bank system and you can identify both buyers and sellers.
  • Buy from / sell to people you know: Facebook has a market place where you can filter for friends and friends of friends.

10. Phishing

This involves using emails or websites to trick you into handing over private information – like your credit card number, passwords to you bank account or other private data that the fraudster can later use to “steal your identity” (pose as you in order to commit further fraud).

Banks and credit card companies will never ask you to verify your password with them. Neither will Yahoo or PayPal.

Always be sure you are at the official URL
of the organisation you want to be dealing with…
and not some tricky variation!

www.yourbanksname.com
is NOT the same as
www.yourbanksname.corporatepaymentverification.com

And as for all you experts who think you will never get fooled… see if you can pass this test!

Is that Everything? No!

This list of threats is by no means exhaustive. Criminals are crafty : they will keep finding new ways to misuse technology.

Advances in technology have given us great new ways to record and exchange information. The internet + social media + camera phones = lots of fun and great possibility for creativity and collaboration. But the era of cool gadgets have come with a whole host of new threats.

Have fun but stay aware!

More:

Feel free to share your stories and comments below.

What is Third Wave Feminism?

Naomi Wolf explains 3rd wave feminism …

Proponents of third-wave feminism claim that it allows women to define feminism for themselves by incorporating their own identities into the belief system of what feminism is and what it can become through one’s own perspective. It can change with every generation and individual… Third-wave feminism seeks to challenge or avoid what it deems the second wave’s “essentialist” definitions of femininity, which often assumed a universal female identity and over-emphasized experiences of upper-middle-class white women. – More: Wikipedia

 

So are you 2nd or 3rd wave… or maybe 4th!

 

Video clips will be posted periodically to highlight topics to our readers. Feel free to comment or to post links to related videos.

 

AWARE questions SIA practice

AWARE refers to the report on “Singapore Girls may finally get maternity benefit” (ST, Sept 10) and are glad that some steps are being taken in the right direction. Nonetheless, the report begs the question about the validity of contractual clauses which require pregnant women to resign.

The report stated that Singapore Airlines (“SIA”) requires its female flight attendants to quit flying after the first trimester of pregnancy (“Quit Flying Requirement”). The reported effect is to deprive female attendants of all maternity benefits unless they can secure ground jobs, which are not easy to get. It appears that pregnant female attendants also lose their jobs. We understand that other airline companies may have similar contractual provisions. At first sight, these provisions are discriminatory and unfair.

The report raises some questions:

What is SIA’s basis for imposing the Quit Flying Requirement?
b) If the basis is solely to protect female attendants or foetuses, can this not be achieved in a fairer way by providing alternative employment for female attendants during pregnancy and allowing them to fly again after their pregnancy?
We hope SIA will respond to these questions.

The report raises some legal issues as well.

AWARE has not had sight of the terms of SIA’s employment contract with its female flight attendants. But we question if such practices should be allowed under our employment statutes which provide for maternity benefits to be paid to employees whose contracts are terminated within 6 months of their confinement.
We note that the Employment Act also prohibits employers from contracting out of their statutory obligations.

If the Quit Flying Clause and similar requirements imposed by other companies are valid, then is there a serious loophole in the law which should be rectified to ensure compliance with the national policy of encouraging childbirth and eliminating gender discrimination?

Further, these requirements are contrary to the principles of the Fair Employment Practices Guidelines that companies should “treat employees fairly and with respect and implement progressive human resource management systems’ and ” provide employees with equal opportunity to help them achieve their full potential”.

We hope that MOM will provide guidelines on these points, and take the necessary action to ensure that pregnant women are not discriminated against by employers through the clever use of contractual clauses which effectively result in the denial of maternity benefits.

Corinna Lim

Executive Director, AWARE

This letter was also published in the Straits Times

AWARE is interested to find out more about the clauses relating to pregnancy in the contracts between flight attendants and the respective airlines. If you have information on this, please send this to intern@aware.org.sg. You may send to us anonymously if you wish. In any event, we will not disclose the source of our information without seeking prior written permission from you.

Update: SIA’s Reply

Headline: SIA has Returning Mothers Scheme and more being done
Date: Monday, 20 September 2010
Straits Times Page: A19
(C) Singapore Press Holdings Limited

I REFER to last Friday’s letter by Ms Corinna Lim (“Pregnancy and flying: Question of fairness in contractual clauses”).

The nature of a flight attendant’s job is multi-faceted, involving not only the provision of service to customers, but also ensuring the safety of our passengers in an unforeseen event. The physical demands of the job mean that all our cabin crew must be fit to perform their duties, and as a responsible employer, we would not think of compromising the physical well-being of pregnant crew and their unborn children.

Our cabin crew are on five-year contracts, rather than on permanent terms, and it is for the reasons stated above that the employment of female crew ceases after the first trimester of a pregnancy. Pregnant crew may then apply for a ground posting. While every effort is taken to produce a match, the reality is that vacancies on the ground are limited and applicants do need to possess relevant skills for a particular job.

We invest heavily in our cabin crew and deeply appreciate their contributions to the company. This is why we have had in place for some years a Returning Mothers Scheme, which allows female crew to rejoin Singapore Airlines in their former capacity, provided they meet the criteria for them to carry out their duties. The scheme has been a success and was formulated in consultation with our staff and unions.

We also recognise that more can be done in the best interests of our female cabin crew population. For some time now we have been in discussion with our unions on a scheme which will provide an ex gratia payment to pregnant crew whose employment ceases. We are in the advanced stages in this process and any new initiative will be communicated to our crew at the appropriate time.

Tan Pee Teck
Senior Vice-President, Cabin Crew
Singapore Airlines

Why we need to express ourselves

Tania De Rozario reports on the first AWARE Roundtable discussion held September 9th.

You must have an opinion, and you must express it“, she declared as she opened the session.

And when Constance Singam exhorts you to do something, you’d better do it. So we paid close attention, not wanting to miss an opportunity to show that we do have opinions … and an ability to voice them.

The 25 of us who had gathered for the inaugural session of the AWARE Roundtable listened as past president Dana Lam took us through a brief history of women’s rights in Singapore, pointing out how laws, policies and social norms relating to gender had evolved and the impact of these on the community.

Peppering her presentation with shockingly sexist remarks made in years past by politicians and other notables, younger members of the audience, unborn or too young to have noticed when those statements were made, shook their heads in disbelief.

Hell. I shook my head in disbelief. Apparently, when I was a teenager, the minister for education was telling us girls that we needed to brush up on our skills pertaining to family life and child-rearing. “Upon your shoulders as mothers and wives, will rest the next generation.”

Wow. No pressure.

It was hard getting a handle on what the single most important issue facing women today really is. People spoke passionately about worklife balance, company policies, the lack of affordable childcare in Singapore and the prevailing existence of the glass ceiling for women working in corporate fields, among other things.

What really struck me about the whole session was the rich amounts of knowledge one derives from simple conversation. It is one thing to read about social issues in a book and another hear someone speak from personal experience:

Female university students shared that their male counterparts would gladly participate in equal parenting if it did not affect their chances of promotion. Lawyers shared that wage increment within corporate fields is often based on arbitrary justifications that support sexism. A former investment banker of 17 years, shared that a signed deal often meant her being excluded from networking opportunities because her male counterparts would celebrate by going to a strip-bar. Parents shared their experiences of the pros and cons of different family structures.

What brought home the importance of these sessions was one participant’s view of how all these issues were linked. She noted that everyone was discussing ways in which we could work towards equality within existing political, social and professional structures. Perhaps, she suggested, it would be more productive for us to be examining the mechanisms of how to change these systems themselves. Everyone was in agreement. But where does one begin?

As someone who enjoyed the first round of these discussions enough to sign up as a core member of this new initiative, I hope that that is what these sessions work towards: Discussions that unravel mechanisms for change.

The AWARE Roundtable series will be held the second Thursday of every month. The next session will see Daniel PS Goh, Assistant Professor of Sociology from NUS, speaking about the rise of fundamentalism and how it is affecting women in Singapore.

Some issues slated for future sessions include the discrimination of pregnant women in the workforce, poverty and the rights of singles.

What gender-related issues are you interested in addressing? Drop us a mail at ed@aware.org.sg to let us know and sign up for the next installment of the AWARE Roundtable here.

These discussions are open to AWARE members only. Come with an opinion.

Why is it only OK on Oprah?

Like millions of others around the world, we watch and commiserate as Americans bare their souls on the Oprah Winfrey Show about sexual abuse, gambling addictions and other problems. But, asks PAMELA NG, why do we get tongue-tied when someone close to us suffers the same problems?

A whopping 7.4 million American people watch Oprah Winfrey. Daily. And that is only in the United States. Internationally, I am not sure of the statistics but I am sure it is in the millions as well.

Many of my friends and even my own mother watches Oprah’s talk show. I watch it too, and for good reason. A woman this influential deserves attention and respect for taking responsibility and talking about real issues.

Some of these are issues which many people squirm away from – mental illness, single parenthood, ADHD, incest, sexual abuse, rape, gambling addictions, alcohol abuse, for example. Sometimes her shows are the only avenue viewers have through which to open their eyes to certain harrowing realities of life.

This is so especially in Asia, where such difficulties often remain cloaked in shame, with survivors ridden with guilt. I wish there were an equivalent in Singapore. But maybe we are not quite ready and our Asian upbringings bind us to silence. The proximity of 4.5 million people on our small island is perhaps daunting in itself.

Awareness is the beginning. It lays a foundation for understanding, and opens the channels for discussion.

However, I notice a disconnect. It is one thing watching Americans bare their soul, uncover uncomfortable truths, heal and cry for all to see and empathise with. It is quite another to embrace a closer reality: a survivor who is a friend, a neighbour, a relative, mother, son or sister.

Suddenly, the communication freezes. No longer a matter of entertainment, discussion flees a dry mouth, instead, we get side glances or undisguised embarrassment and discomfort.

Why does it stop at entertainment value?

The Woman I Want My Daughter To Be

Like many other women in Singapore, NICOLE TAN juggles family and work and sometimes finds it a struggle. So why did she decide to take on the extra load of becoming President of AWARE?
Nicole

Dear Members,

As I write this, my first note to you in my capacity as President, I am conscious that I have, for the third time this month, skipped tutoring my eight year old in Chinese. If the past weeks are indicative, there will be many more skipped sessions ahead. Will she miss them? I’m sure she (or her results) will let me know soon. She sits for her Chinese test tomorrow.

I am not alone in my predicament – high functioning on one level; anxious and not just a little guilty and scared on another. Like many of you, like many women in Singapore, I juggle family and work. I truly empathise with the woman who wants it all but fears that something’s got to give.

Nonetheless, I am going to try to fill some really big shoes as AWARE president. I don’t mind saying, I feel the weight of my predecessors on my shoulders as I write.

For 25 years, AWARE has been the forum for women, a place where thoughts are formed and spoken and given life through action. One after another, you stood up, pushed back your fears, and spoke up.

One after another, you have stood your ground, and spoken up against domestic violence, date rape, sexual harassment, discriminatory policies. You have put your names to your words and acted on your conviction, even when it would have been so much easier to say ‘no comment’. And because you spoke up, others have learned to find their voices and to use them.

I too will now have to push aside my own fears, find my voice and use it and so add to the foundations of the road that was opened for us 25 years ago.

This forum is precious. It was precious to the giants before me; it is precious to me; and unless AWARE succeeds beyond our wildest imagination, it will be precious to my daughter and perhaps to her daughters also.

What is AWARE to you? It is important that we, each of us, evaluate the question honestly. Your answer may well compel you to action.

In closing, I thank my family for the sacrifices that they will have to make in the next two years. Above all, I thank you for the opportunity to be the woman I want my daughter to be.

Fearfully Fearless,

Nicole Tan
President

Old and new faces on new AWARE Board

Election of 7-member governing body marks new phase of growth
and service AWARE

Exco 2010

AWARE has begun a new phase of growth and service.

At the 25th Annual General Meeting on 28 August, members elected a seven-member Board that will serve for two years instead of one and will provide leadership for the association in a governance rather than an operational role.

The new Board, comprising both veteran and relatively new members, is led by corporate lawyer Nicole Tan as President and family lawyer Halijah Mohamad as Vice President. [See full list of Board members.]

Nicole, who has been an AWARE member for 13 years, served on the last Executive Committee as the Assistant Secretary and Chair of the Legal Subcommittee. She was also a member of the Professionalisation Subcommittee and drafted the new bye-laws.

“AWARE”, said Nicole, “provides a forum for exploration, expression and education on gender equality issues. This forum is precious. It was precious to the giants before me; it is precious to me; and – unless AWARE succeeds beyond our wildest imagination – it will be precious for my daughter.

“This year AWARE celebrates its 25th anniversary. We are also embarking on a new, more professional phase. My professional training as a lawyer, in particular a corporate lawyer, equips me with skills that are relevant and important in this phase of evolution of the Association.

“Like many of our members, I juggle family and work. I truly empathise with the woman who wants it all, the woman who fears that something’s got to give. So it is not without trepidation that I put this new role on my already full plate; and I thank my family, in advance, for the sacrifices that they will have to make.

“That said, I am very glad that I have on the board a mixture of old and new members balancing continuity with the infusion of new blood. We have lawyers, an entrepreneur and educationist, media and marketing professionals, academics, and a financial adviser, each bringing to the table their different perspective of being a woman and their different professional skills.”

Nicole, who is bilingual, added: “During the next two years, AWARE will draw on her strengths in research and public education and reach out to the non-English speaking public. AWARE will also strengthen her competencies and engage in discussion and debate on issues that affect us all. I say to all who can contribute, please join us!”

Welcoming the “great mix of old and new faces’” on the new Board, former President Dana Lam said it had been a privilege to serve AWARE in what had been an exceptionally challenging year.

“I’m very proud of the team,” she said. “We pulled together and we have definitely come out of the year stronger. What I am most proud of is the team’s commitment to renewal and continuity. The threat to AWARE’s values and principles led many of us to realize that we must protect and advance what we believe in. This has served us very well in the past year and I am sure it will continue in the future.

“In the past year, we focussed on identifying our key needs and on the professionalization process. This commitment to professionalising our operations began when Constance Singam was leading AWARE in 2008. We are fortunate that Corinna Lim was able and willing to take on the task of being Executive Director. With her leading the operations of AWARE, we are now more ready than ever to move forward.”

Corinna Lim, who became Executive Director in March this year, described the members of the new Board as “strong individuals, dynamic and smart, each with a wealth of experience in their respective fields”.

She added: “I have worked closely with both Nicole Tan and Halijah Mohamed and have the highest regard for them as individuals and as professionals. I have no doubt that with their leadership, the Board will be an effective and high functioning team that will see AWARE reaching new heights.

“I would also like to say a Big Thank You to the outgoing Board, especially to Dana Lam and Chew Ijin, for their courageous dedication and leadership. This was a more onerous year than usual and they have sacrificed a great deal to see AWARE through the year and to turn what was a crisis into an opportunity to strengthen AWARE.”

The switch from a 12-member Executive Committee that served for one year to a seven-member Board serving for two years follows changes to AWARE’s Constitution approved by members at the 23rd AGM held in March 2008. Another change requires candidates for the Board to have been AWARE members for at least two years.

Members of the AWARE Board 2010-2012

President
Nicole Tan
aware_NicoleTan Vice President
Halijah Mohamed
 

 

 

 

 

Immediate
Past President
Dana Lam

 

Treasurer
Ann Seow
 

Secretary

Lindy Ong

 

Members
Chew I-Jin aware_Chew-I-Jin Margaret Thomas aware_MargaretThomas
Teo You Yenn

My goodness, you missed my point!

When policy-makers make decisions that profoundly affect the lives of people, are they able to suspend the influence of personal factors, such as sex, race and religion? That, says CONSTANCE SINGAM, was the question she was posing in her article A Secular Society Interrupted, and not the question of whether there is such a thing as innate goodness.

A war of words raged on these pages a few weeks ago. My article A Secular Society Interrupted led several readers to engage in a heated debate about whether there is such a thing as innate goodness.

I would very much like to believe in the ‘innate goodness’ of human beings. But I have no empirical evidence to support that belief.

The French philosopher Jean Jacques Rousseau believed in the innate goodness of man, that man did not acquire ethical and moral values but was born with them. According to Immanuel Kant, the German philosopher, these innate ideas are the only things we have certain knowledge of, and thus are the most important and trustworthy of all.

Confucian philosophy is built on the l belief that man is basically good. He did say, though, “I for my part have never yet seen one who really cared for goodness, nor one who really abhorred wickedness.” (Analects 4:6)

What I was arguing in A Secular Society Interrupted was simply that one should not assume that those who do not subscribe to a religion have no sense of right and wrong, or that their stand on certain issues is suspect since they don’t believe in God.
In making that argument, my main concern is whether we are able, if we owe allegiance to a religion, to suspend our religious values in a public space in a secular society rich in diversity of religion, culture and race. This is not, however, a denial of the role of religion in public life and debate on issues and policies. Every individual has a civic responsibility to engage in public debate in areas that matter to them.

My point is that the need to suspend personal beliefs is a critical requirement of policy-makers. Every day, policy-makers are called upon to make decisions that profoundly affect the lives of people. Are they able to suspend the influence of personal factors, such as sex, race and religion, and make decisions based on facts? Or, at least, can they tell us, the citizens, on what basis they have made their decisions on matters that affect us? Are they able to be transparent?

As I see it, the problem, particularly in Singapore, is the lack of a safe place for such questions to be raised; for an open discussion on the role of religion, the role of conscience in public life.
Meanwhile, on the discussion about ‘innate goodness’ – my Google research revealed that it is a very hotly debated topic. I have yet to discover which side is winning the argument.

I conclude, on a lighter note, with a story. It’s from Faith without God: Finding Courage in Hard Times by Lawrence Bush of the Brooklyn Society for Ethical Culture. He writes:

There is a Jewish story about a devout man who is on a difficult business trip and realizes that he’ll never get home before the sun sets and the Sabbath begins. He presents himself at the home of the local rabbi and says, ‘Rabbi, the Sabbath is about to begin, please let me stay with you and keep me from sinning.’

The rabbi says, ‘My good man, I have a household full, I cannot fit one more. Go in good health; I’m sure that God will provide.’

The poor traveler goes to another house, with religious ornamentation on its door, and he gets the same friendly rebuff, ‘I’m sure God will provide.’ This keeps happening, as the sun sinks and darkness spreads.

Finally he comes to the home of the local Bundist, the radical, the atheist. And he is amazed to be brought in. And he is amazed that the Bundist has Sabbath candles on the table, waiting to be lit, and bread and wine, waiting to be blessed and eaten.

They do all that together, and the traveler says, ‘My friend, how can it be? All of the religious Jews in your town send me away from their door, telling me that God will provide; and you, a rascal, an atheist, you bring me in and treat me to kindness . . .’
‘Because, my brother,’ says the Bundist, ‘I know that God will not provide.’