Year: 2021

Position Filled: Senior Projects Executive, Advocacy, Research and Communications

Job Listing

We are no longer accepting applicants for this role.

AWARE’s Advocacy, Research and Communications department is looking for a Senior Projects Executive who will work to strategically provide evidence for AWARE’s core advocacy messages to the public, the media and our diverse community of members, donors and clients. For 2022, you will help coordinate AWARE’s upcoming Growing Up Indian project, and a research project on domestic violence.

As part of our small team, you will work to strategically provide evidence for AWARE’s core advocacy messages to the public, the media and our diverse community of members, donors and clients. For 2022, you will help coordinate AWARE’s upcoming Growing Up Indian project, and a research project on domestic violence.

This is an exciting opportunity for an early career professional who is savvy, creative and well-versed in feminism and social justice topics.

Position: Senior Projects Executive, Advocacy, Research and Communications (ARC)
Department: ARC
Salary range: SGD$3,750 – 3,900
Term: Full-time, 1-year employment contract (renewable)
Starting date: January 2022

Job Description

Project Coordination 

  • Timely coordination of AWARE’s Growing Up Indian (GUI) project, including assistance with budgeting, funding applications, coordination of honorariums
  • Liaising with contributors, volunteers, communications and fundraising staff, designers, printers, and other partners
  • Co-writing the introduction to the GUI anthology, editing and proofreading submissions
  • Organising public engagement events to publicise the launch of GUI, community workshops on oral histories, intercultural understanding, and effective writing

Advocacy and Research

  • Project coordination of AWARE’s primary research projects (including assistance with budgeting, funding applications, recruitment and training of personnel, coordination of payments etc.)
  • Research support for AWARE’s primary research projects, including conducting literature review, assistance with drafting interview and focus group discussion interview guides, conducting interviews and focus group discussions, data analysis, and writing of research reports)
  • Drafting occasional forum letters on primary research topics (e.g forum letters) on AWARE’s core advocacy areas
  • Developing and executing AWARE’s public advocacy campaigns to accompany the publication of new research
  • Helping the ARC department to conceptualise, organise and promote events (both online and, in the long term, offline)
  • Other miscellaneous administrative tasks

Preferred Candidate Profile

  • Singapore Citizen/Permanent Resident with at least two years of related work experience in project coordination, conducting primary and secondary research
  • A diploma/degree in political science, sociology, gender studies, media and communications, or any other related field is strongly preferred
  • Top-notch communication skills (perfect written and spoken English)
  • Confident public speaking and presentation skills
  • A keen editorial sense, with an eye for clean, sharp and impactful copy
  • Competency to maintain positive and effective working relationships with a broad range of stakeholders
  • Prior experience organising events
  • Ability to work independently to manage projects
  • Strong belief in gender equality and the values of AWARE

You must read and acknowledge our Privacy Statement here.

Please note that due to the large number of applications, only shortlisted applicants will be contacted for an interview. If you have any questions about this position, please email careers@aware.org.sg.

Nelle’s* story: One more gateway to healing

by Nelle Lim*

Our “Your Stories” series are submissions shared with us via email or in one-on-one interviews, for the purposes of our research and campaigns. All names have been changed (unless the use of real names was explicitly permitted by the author), and we have sought permission to publish from the authors/interviewees themselves. The opinions expressed in these posts do not represent those of AWARE.

“I don’t even know how to tell you this,” I said to my friend, whilst we sat on the pavement of a side street in Tiong Bahru after supper.

He waited.

“So… my mentor… sort of made me touch… and I touched… and it’s not the first time. And I don’t know why I keep letting—why I don’t just say no. But it’s not that I want it. It makes me feel so gross. And I keep wanting to believe… each time will be the last time. Everyone makes mistakes, right? I mean… it’s my mentor. I owe so much to—but every time I feel… hands on my body like that… I just—”

This was poor storytelling. But, I thought, if I didn’t say the keywords, maybe it would be like none of it really happened. And the sick feeling in my gut would stay there, and not land all over our shoes.

I remember my friend’s struggle to make sense of what I was saying. But he was patient and didn’t jump to conclusions. He didn’t know what to do, but reassured me that nothing I’d said changed what he thought of me. I could tell he truly cared. And for that night, that was enough.

It was only four years later that I was given another set of keywords, ones that would begin to unlock some much-needed clarity. Another friend, another lifesaver.

“This is sexual assault.”

“What? No, it’s not… I mean, I didn’t exactly put up a fight.”

“But did you want to do it?”

“Of course not. But then… why did I? If I didn’t want to but did it anyway, isn’t that just me being weak?”

“Maybe you felt that you couldn’t say ‘no’. That’s not the same as saying ‘yes’…”

“What do you mean…?”

Sexual Assault and Abuse of Power

Say “sexual assault” and the first image that pops into people’s heads is a stranger pinning someone down in a dark alley. But the reality is that an estimated 8 in 10 victims are sexually assaulted by someone we know and trust.

There are additional complexities when perpetrators have a position of power and authority in their victims’ lives. Especially when they are people to whom victims feel they owe a great deal—whether in their personal or professional lives.

It usually starts with a blurring of boundaries—perhaps the sharing of too much personal information. The initial rush of feeling trusted by someone we admire can be heady. We want to live up to the privilege of being chosen to keep their secrets.

They then cross the lines, subtly at first. A hug that goes on for too long. Seemingly offhand and “objective” remarks about how attractive we look. Little things that we would feel ridiculous voicing discomfort over. When we’re so much younger, how do we confront an adult, and one who is highly esteemed? It’s easier to convince ourselves that we’re reading too much into things.

Then they cross an obvious line. And they express remorse. They hate that they’ve hurt us. Can we forgive them for their lapse of judgement (they love us so much; they couldn’t help it)? Can we promise not to tell anyone? Everyone will misunderstand their love for us. We feel sorry for them. They promise that it would never happen again.

But it does. Even though things look up for a while. The woeful routine works a few more times. But when we get frustrated with them, they change tactics: They gaslight. Sneering that we’re making a big deal about something so insignificant: “Huh, like that also cannot ah?” Mocking our attempts to set up boundaries: “So you’ll set a timer for how long I can hug you?” Being impatient that we need time to regulate after each assault: “Don’t tell me you’re not going to speak to me for three days again…” The twisted mind games—claims that we actually wanted their advances. And, when they feel we really might leave them, the threats of suicide…

It was my first time encountering someone like this. With no prior framework to name or explain what was happening, I had no defences for this older person’s manipulative arsenal. All I did was second-guess whether my own boundaries were reasonable, and feel guilt and fear for asserting myself.

After many cycles, it became easier to just… go with it. Putting up a fight was emotionally exhausting and futile. The assaults got more frequent and invasive over the next two years. I bought into the perpetrator’s lies that it was my fault for being a temptation. I felt I only had myself to blame for being “too weak to resist”.

Life seasons change, and I ended up not seeing this former mentor as often. Eventually I gathered the courage to cut off contact completely. But the misplaced guilt and deep shame stayed with me for years after.

The Gift of a Good First Responder

I can now explain these dynamics and see that the manipulation was intended to deflect the real wrong at hand: that the perpetrator was sexually violating me against my consent. But this has only been possible after nearly a decade of research, therapy and those initial supportive first responses from friends.

Given how much I’d misunderstood my situation, and how incoherently I was telling my story, things could have gone so badly. My friends could have easily concluded that I’d been “asking for it”, or assumed that the perpetrator couldn’t have meant to do this.

But they listened. They put their discomfort of talking about “sex stuff” aside and focused on being there for me. As a result, they could hear the story behind my stuttering words and realised that I’d been badly hurt. They then tried to figure out how best to give me the help I needed to heal.

Having friends who didn’t judge meant that I didn’t have to deal with the anguish of being dismissed by loved ones I’d trusted. Instead, their support was an anchor, tethering me to a reality deeper than my trauma: No matter what I’d become associated with, I was loved. I was believed. 

It meant that I had the courage to make a report and then go through the organisation’s internal inquiry process. It meant that the victim-blaming questions I subsequently received didn’t destroy me by forcing me to assume responsibility for someone else’s immorality. It meant that I had the strength to work through my PTSD in therapy. It meant that the truth that the assault was not my fault could eventually settle in my head and heart, and I had a chance to heal.

AWARE’s Sexual Assault First Responder Training 

Nearly a decade after our conversation in Tiong Bahru, my friend and I attended AWARE’s Sexual Assault First Responder Training (SAFRT). We learned why it’s difficult for victims to speak about assault, how to identify sexual assault nonetheless, and the steps to take after someone has confided in us.

I was relieved by how many things my friends had got right all those years ago, even without training. But after the session, my friend told me quietly that he regretted not having all the skills to immediately recognise what I had been trying to tell him. He could have known how to get me the right help sooner.

While I didn’t blame him at all, I could see his point. Education does make a difference in being able to deliver intentional help. Every person trained is one fewer person likely to wound an already ravaged victim. One more gateway to a road of healing.

Whether by chance or providence, I’ve been fortunate to have good first responders who could figure things out with me along the way. But there are many more victims shattered by ignorant or victim-blaming responses. What AWARE’s SAFRT is creating is a world where a good first response won’t be an anomaly or a miracle. It would be a given.

Support Sexual Assault First Responder Training and AWARE’s other initiatives against sexual violence by donating to the Hope in the Dark fundraising campaign on Giving.sg. To attend SAFRT, check for upcoming dates on AWARE’s Eventbrite page

Closed: Director, Development and Operations, AWARE

We are no longer accepting applicants for this role.

AWARE has grown significantly in the last decade from six staff members to a 40-person organisation. The addition of this newly created role of Director, Development and Operations (DDO) within AWARE’s Senior Management team will further enhance strategic growth, operational sustainability and impact as Singapore enters an exciting new phase, with the government seeking to establish gender equality as a core value of society.

Reporting to the Executive Director of AWARE, the DDO will have overall responsibility for increasing and diversifying AWARE’s fundraising revenue, to deliver annual fundraising growth of 25% over the next three years. The DDO will also be responsible for aligning and enhancing AWARE’s internal processes to support its ambitious strategic focus and growth. This includes managing the Finance, Office Operations, Membership and Volunteer Management functions (“Shared Services”) which support the programme departments.

This is an exciting opportunity for a leader with extensive experience in fundraising and/or business development and excellent general management skills; a person who is committed to social justice and is looking for a concrete way to contribute to society in Singapore.

The ideal candidate will be an excellent communicator and skilled relationship builder as well as an innovative and resourceful, dynamic and results-oriented leader—someone who is an inspiring people manager and an organised, hands-on collaborator who gets things done.

Position: Director, Development and Operations, AWARE
Salary range: SGD$8,000 – 10,000
Term: Full-time, permanent employment contract
Starting date: March/April 2022

Job Description

Fundraising

  • Develop and implement annual and multi-year fundraising plans, with customised strategies to cultivate, solicit and steward new and existing donors
  • Build and foster partnerships and networks to cultivate donors, members and advocates, positioning AWARE as a unique and powerful agent for positive change in Singapore
  • Leverage on personal and AWARE connections to engage progressive companies and their employees to support AWARE’s work
  • Oversee fundraising events, such as the annual AWARE Ball, donor cultivation and recognition events
  • Lead and develop the Fundraising team, comprising staff, interns and volunteers, to achieve the above
  • Actively serve as a spokesperson representing AWARE to its constituency as well as potential donors and supporters

Shared services

Lead, direct and develop AWARE’s Shared Services functions and staff to support AWARE’s strategic growth in an effective and sustainable way:

  • Finance – budgeting, accounting and financial management for AWARE, ensuring stewardship and integrity
  • Office Operations – general office management to ensure effective, high-quality work environment, office and technology systems
  • Constituency Management – engaging members and volunteers for leverage and impact

Senior Management

The Senior Management team is collectively responsible for anticipating future needs and opportunities, articulating AWARE’s strategic direction, achieving annual and longer-term strategic plans and ensuring the ongoing sustainability of the organisation.

Preferred Candidate Profile

 

  • Singapore Citizen/Permanent Resident with university degree and minimum 15 years’ total professional experience. At least 10 years relevant experience in fundraising/business development and in leading and managing teams, preferably in the Singapore context
  • Strong track record with partners, foundations and individual donors in the non-profit sector, or successful business development or revenue generation experience in the commercial sector
  • Superior interpersonal, verbal, written and presentation skills and the ability to collaborate and build alliances; able to engage effectively and diplomatically with diverse groups of donors, volunteers, members and other constituents across different sectors, e.g., government agencies, non-profits and corporates
  • Has managed teams in a way that is consistent with AWARE’s mission, vision and values (diversity, choice, gender rights, respect for others); able to attract, engage, develop and retain the right staff in the right roles
  • Technologically savvy, well-versed in information systems and data management; able to leverage innovative tools and technologies. Ideally experienced in digital marketing
  • Collaborative, energetic, self-motivated and personable with sound judgement, strong organisational and problem-solving skills and a positive, forward-thinking mindset
  • Shares AWARE’s feminist perspective and understands what drives people to work and volunteer in the non-profit sector

Please note that due to the large number of applications, only shortlisted applicants will be contacted for an interview. If you have any questions about this position, please email careers@aware.org.sg.

Position Filled: Senior Manager, Advocacy, Research and Communications

We are no longer accepting applicants for this role.

AWARE is expanding its Advocacy, Research and Communications (ARC) department to accelerate Singapore’s transition to a more gender equal society, in line with the government’s plan to establish gender equality as a core value of society.

This newly created role of Senior Manager, ARC will enhance AWARE’s capacity to make gender equality a reality in all aspects of our society: national laws and policies, workplaces, home, schools and community.

Working closely with the other departments and reporting to the Head of ARC, the Senior Manager, ARC will help to manage a broad range of efforts focused on furthering AWARE’s advocacy goals, including research projects, stakeholder outreach, project management and community engagement.

This is an exciting opportunity for an individual who is passionate and knowledgeable about women’s rights and gender issues, has at least five years of relevant experience in social policy-making and/or advocating for social justice, including conceptualising and implementing community campaigns for social change.

Position: Senior Manager, Advocacy, Research and Communications (ARC)
Department: ARC
Salary range: SGD$5,300 – 6,000
Term: Full-time, employment contract
Starting date: December 2021

Job Description

Advocacy and Research

1. The Senior Manager, ARC will work with the ARC Head to:

  • Implement sound, robust and effective advocacy strategies, work plans and departmental budgets for AWARE
  • Actively engage in the interpretation of research results, including framing research reports, policy papers and other programme deliverables
  • Maintain quality standards of AWARE’s research-oriented services, such as the  Workplace Harassment and Discrimination Advisory
  • Work cross-functionally with the Women’s Care Centre and Sexual Assault Care Centre to analyse deidentified service data
  • Lead knowledge-development and data-management for key programme areas

Outreach and Networking

2. Work closely with the ARC Head to:

  • Identify and network with partner organisations, including other civil society organisations
  • Organise and participate in public/community events to further AWARE’s advocacy goals
  • Represent AWARE to stakeholders and the general public

Community Engagement

3. Work with other members of the ARC team to oversee and manage the development and delivery of trainings, such as AWARE’s Sexual Assault First Responder training and AWARE’s sexuality education programme aimed at parents.

Fundraising

4. Work cross-functionally with the fundraising team to identify fundraising opportunities, draft high-quality fundraising proposals, and prepare comprehensive monitoring and evaluation reports as required by funders.

Preferred Candidate Profile

 

  • Singapore Citizen/Permanent Resident with university degree in social sciences, law, public policy or administration, or other relevant field
  • At least five years of experience working/advocating on gender equality issues, such as violence against women, labour rights, caregiving or related social justice issues
  • Working familiarity with local legislative frameworks, especially with respect to the rights of marginalised women and girls, ageing and caregiving, and workplace harassment and discrimination
  • Experience working with and managing internal and external stakeholders
  • Prior experience with policy analysis, public presentations, communications and community engagement
  • Strong interpersonal, verbal, written and presentation skills and the ability to collaborate and build alliances
  • High degree of flexibility and ability to work on a wide variety of policy issues
  • Has supervised teams in a way that is consistent with AWARE’s mission, vision and values (diversity, choice, gender rights, respect for others); able to attract, engage, develop and retain the right staff in the right roles
  • Technologically savvy, well-versed in information systems and data management; able to leverage innovative tools and technologies. Ideally experienced in digital marketing
  • Collaborative, energetic, self-motivated and personable with sound judgement, strong organisational and problem-solving skills and a positive, forward-thinking mindset
  • Shares AWARE’s feminist perspective

You must read and acknowledge our Privacy Statement here.

Please note that due to the large number of applications, only shortlisted applicants will be contacted for an interview. If you have any questions about this position, please email careers@aware.org.sg.

Ahead of Deepavali, AWARE launches Kickstarter campaign to raise $20,000 for Growing Up Indian, an anthology giving voice to Indian women in Singapore

This post was originally published as a press release on 28 October 2021.

28 October 2021 – To close a year marked by both shocking racist incidents and community resilience in the face of the pandemic, gender-equality group AWARE today launched a Kickstarter campaign for a new anthology of stories at the intersection of gender and the Indian experience in Singapore.

Titled Growing Up Indian, this book will be edited by AWARE’s Shailey Hingorani and A. Preethi Devi, and published in Q3 2022 by Ethos Books, who also published AWARE’s 2018 collection Growing Up Perempuan (focusing on the Muslim women experience). With the campaign, AWARE hopes to raise $20,000 to fund the production of the book for a 500-copy initial print run. The campaign will run for two months, ending on 27 December 2021; as per Kickstarter’s all-or-nothing funding model, the full goal will need to be reached for donations to be processed.

The anthology, consisting 30 personal essays and poems curated by AWARE from a pool of submissions from the public, will also feature original writing from an array of familiar names: Balli Kaur Jaswal, Akshita Nanda, Sharul Channa, Anita Kapoor, Devika Panicker, Grace Kalaiselvi, as well as former AWARE president Constance Singam. The (mostly female) contributors will celebrate and dissect the Indian experience, touching on as diverse and complex themes as language, immigration, belonging and otherness, stereotypes and taboos, myths, cultural rituals, pop culture, celebrations and festivals. 

Growing Up Indian is a perfect embodiment of AWARE’s intersectional feminist approach,” said Shailey Hingorani, AWARE’s Head of Research and Advocacy. “The rise in racist and xenophobic behaviour that occurred this year alongside the spread of the Delta variant distressed us deeply. As such, we wanted to create a platform that foregrounds the lived experiences of Indian women, who are marginalised doubly in Singapore for their gender and their race. At the same time, we hope to remind readers of the joys of ‘growing up Indian’—which is an experience not solely of oppression, but of joy and camaraderie.”

“There are many untold stories about the challenges and joys of being Indian in Singapore,” said author Balli Kaur Jaswal (Erotic Stories for Punjabi Widows). “Growing Up Indian will amplify the voices of emerging writers and explore a range of subjects that speak to our multifaceted experiences and identities.”

“To be ‘Indian’ in Singapore is to have an identity outlined by state and social norms,” said author Akshita Nanda (Beauty Queens of Bishan), “but our personal identities can’t be that easily summarised. We have so many tales to share: stories of heartbreak, humour, resilience and breaking boundaries.

“Growing up as a brown woman in Singapore, I constantly felt an unspoken pressure to be apologetic for the space I took up,” said actress and model Devika Panicker. “It is about time we acknowledge the experiences of the countless Indian powerhouses in Singapore, and celebrate taking up space in a society that constantly tries to dim our light.”

With donation tiers ranging from $20 to $200, Kickstarter backers will receive at least one copy of Growing Up Indian before it goes on sale. Other perks include being listed on a special acknowledgements section of AWARE’s website, and invited to the book’s launch party in 2022.

AWARE is in the process of collecting essays and poems for the collection, with submissions closing on 14 December 2021. To assist aspiring contributors, AWARE is also conducting a free ideation workshop on 13 November 2021, led by Balli Kaur Jaswal, who will guide participants on refining their essay pitches before submission.

Beyond the anthology collection, the Growing Up Indian project will include an interactive website, a new play by Sharul Channa and a workshop series on interviewing and documentary, creative writing and cross-cultural understanding.

“Deepavali is traditionally a time of reminiscence and reunion,” said AWARE’s Ms. Hingorani. “It’s an occasion to reflect on our identities, histories and heritage—the differences that make us unique and the common bonds that unite us. We hope that whether you are a donor, contributor or reader, Growing Up Indian will be a catalyst for that.”

Sleeping women can’t consent to sexual activity

This op-ed was originally published in Channel NewsAsia on October 26 2021

SINGAPORE: A fog of confusion hovers over sexual consent and what it really looks like.

In no other sexual assault case in recent history has this been more obvious than the case involving Singapore Management University (SMU) student Lee Yan Ru, who was sentenced on Monday (25 Oct) to 10 months’ jail and three strokes of the cane for molesting a woman during an overnight study session in 2019.

The question of consent was central, since the perpetrator admitted to making repeated physical advances towards the victim – ultimately rubbing his genitalia on the victim’s sleeping form and ejaculating on her face, neck and hair – without asking her for consent.

The perpetrator claimed she was “fine” with his advances. He also earlier testified that when the victim said “stop” – woken up by a feeling of heaviness on her body – he interpreted it as “carry on”, and that context mattered in evaluating what “stop” meant.

Even if we write off the defence’s arguments as last-ditch attempts to escape punishment, they are disturbingly echoed in many social media comments made since the judgment was announced.

This confusion over consent worries many women’s rights activists, because acts of sexual violence are defined primarily by a lack of consent.

Yet while most people would agree, in theory, on the basic principle that “no means no”, the perpetrator’s testimony and the comments on social media show an incomplete understanding of how even an expressed “no” plays out in reality.

Worse, in this case, the woman was unable to consent because – as the judge noted – she was asleep when Lee started performing the sexual act on her.

CONSENT IS SPECIFIC

A common thread that runs between the perpetrator’s testimony and netizens’ comments relates to how the victim’s behaviour earlier in the night was “misleading”.

The perpetrator testified in court that he thought the whole night was “a progressive thing” and that she was “okay with my advances”.

His testimony repeats a common misunderstanding about consent: That consenting to one activity once constitutes consent for other activities, or for the same activity at other times.

Yet consenting to kiss someone doesn’t give them the permission to fondle you. Having sex with someone in the past doesn’t mean consenting to sexual activities in the future.

Consent is an ongoing conversation. Even if the victim in the SMU case had verbally consented to the perpetrator resting his feet on her thighs earlier in the night (which she clarified she hadn’t), that wouldn’t mean he had permission to rub himself on her chest in the morning.

The perpetrator should have sought consent again with each “progressive” physical or sexual activity.

Another aspect of the confusion over consent in this case is what one netizen calls the “signals” the victim was sending: “If she was uncomfortable with his advances, why didn’t she leave?”

When asked this in court, the victim herself cited other reasons, including not wanting to “leave a bad impression” as they had mutual friends, and there being “no mode of transport” available in the middle of the night – nothing to do with her desire to engage in sexual activity.

The bottom line is this: Since it’s impossible to divine what another person is thinking and feeling, it is best to actively ask and communicate feelings of being ready, safe, aroused, desirous and physically responsive before engaging in sexual activity.

“STOP” DOESN’T MEAN CARRY ON

Still, how is it possible for someone to hear “stop” and understand it as “carry on”?

There is the misguided belief that women offer “token resistance” – that they typically say “no” when they really mean “yes” – as part of culturally prescribed scripts for sexual interactions. Indeed, the defence in this case relied heavily on this trope, characterising the victim’s attitude as “coy”.

Researchers call these “sexual scripts” – outdated narratives where men initiate and pursue sex and women are gatekeepers responsible for limiting and saying no.

These scripts assume that men have an uncontrollable desire for sex, something we saw in the SMU case too. The perpetrator wanted “release” in a “moment of lust”  – playing into the male stereotype of an unmanageable libido.

ASKING FOR CONSENT IS NOT UNROMANTIC

Consent creates a safe space and teaches us to respect people’s boundaries. Yet many complain that asking for consent before each specific activity is unromantic. Much better – the argument goes – to read your partner’s mind without having to utter a single word.

Yet there are many ways of phrasing the consent question that do not “kill the mood”. For example, “does this feel nice? Do you like this?”

Some argue that non-verbal affirmations, such as nodding or noises of pleasure – as opposed to passive signals, like silence or lack of resistance – can be taken as consent. But as humans may be neurologically hard-wired to see what we want to see, we should not rely entirely on non-verbal cues.

It’s not that women don’t know how to clearly assert non-consent, which implies that crimes like sexual assault are simply cases of miscommunication. As this SMU case very powerfully shows, even explicit refusals are often ignored or overruled.

Such problems have led some, like the police commissioner of New South Wales in Australia, to suggest the need for an app for couples to establish and record mutual consent before engaging in sex.

Yet critics argue that this approach promotes a contractual understanding of sexual relations. Consent cannot be deduced from an app and it cannot be negotiated ahead of time. It’s about communication in the moment.

A better method might be the acronym used widely by women’s organisations around the world: Consent is as easy as FRIES – it should be Freely given, Reversible, Informed, Enthusiastic and Specific.

Making sure you understand this before engaging in sexual activity is probably easier and way more effective than an app.

AN ACTIVE DEFINITION OF CONSENT

Some jurisdictions have already strengthened consent legislation.

Under its so-called “yes means yes” legislation, Tasmanian law requires the accused to show they did or said something to find out if a person was consenting. Perpetrators cannot rely on the “mistaken, but reasonable belief” defence that consent was provided.

Locally, Singapore’s Penal Code sub-section 90 highlights that consent is not valid under specific circumstances, such as if given by a person who is under fear of injury or wrongful restraint, mentally unsound or incapacitated, intoxicated or under the influence of substances, or otherwise unable to understand the nature and consequence of what they are consenting to.

Would an active definition of consent go further? AWARE’s experiences with sexual assault survivors and interactions with medical practitioners, social workers and the police suggest perhaps a clear, statutory definition of consent, from a public education point of view, is needed.

One possible option is based on case law, referred to in a 2012 case of rape at Sentosa. Although the full definition is too long to reproduce, here’s a paraphrased version for consideration: “Consent is the free, informed and voluntary participation in the sexual activity in question. Lack of resistance and submission to sexual activity, in itself, is not consent as a matter of law.”

Parents and teenagers also suggest including consent as one of the mainstays of sexuality education in schools, so that stereotypical sexual scripts can be debated.

Let’s not keep using the disturbing trope of Prince Charming kissing a sleeping Snow White as a template for real-life sexual interactions.

Shailey Hingorani, Head of Research and Advocacy, AWARE

Growing Up Indian: Ideation Workshop With Balli Kaur Jaswal

If you’re currently mulling over an idea for a personal essay to submit to our Growing Up Indian anthology, and would like some guidance, here’s a fantastic opportunity! Attend a free ideation workshop over Zoom, conducted by acclaimed local novelist Balli Kaur Jaswal. Receive guidance from Balli and constructive feedback from other participants in order to strengthen the angle, themes and structure of your essay. 

So that each participant receives personalised attention, this workshop is limited to 15 participants. We will select participants based on their pitch ideas (submit up to three pitches) and notify all applicants about their acceptance one week before the workshop. Each pitch should be about at least one aspect of your lived experiences as an Indian woman in Singapore.

Please note that this workshop is designed to shape ideas and not already written pieces. 

Applications are now closed.

The online workshop is free of charge and will take place on Saturday, 13 November from 1pm to 3pm. For consideration to be included in AWARE’s Growing Up Indian anthology, writers must submit their complete stories to the anthology by Tuesday, 14 December. 


Themes

Learn more about Growing Up Indian on our call for entries page. We’re on the lookout for stories that bring out the themes below:

  • Straddling two or three different worlds, e.g. “mainstream” Singapore, being Indian, being a minority Indian in Singapore 
  • Experiences with language, e.g. studying your mother tongue after school or on weekends
  • Supernatural stories or superstitions you’ve grown up with
  • “Taboo” topics such as sexual health, desire and sexual attraction, religious practices and beliefs
  • Cultural rituals, celebrations and festivals that held special meaning for you as a child 
  • Food, cuisine and recipe related tales
  • Didactic mythological stories or folklore linked to sexuality, mental health, marriage or divorce
  • Unique family histories, traditions, e.g. the multi-generational history of activism
  • Belonging, e.g. feeling of connectedness to an idea, a country, a culture or an identity 
  • Otherness, e.g. ways in which you might have been marked as different
  • Pop culture, e.g. music, film, celebrities, advertisements, fashion, trends or memes
  • Travel, e.g. familial impacts of migration, holidays in your country of origin or sending/receiving packages

Other details

  1. Your pitch and final submission should be in English.
  2. Essays should be between 1,000-2,000 words long.
  3. You do not need to have written or been published formally in order to send in your pitch.
  4. Pitches should be original content: stories that have been previously published will not be considered for the workshop. 
  5. Writers who have already submitted a story for consideration can submit another pitch. 
  6. This anthology will prioritise female voices. However, if you are not female and would like to contribute writing on themes of gender or masculinity, you can still submit your pitch.
  7. AWARE reserves the right to shortlist and select both the selected workshop applicants and the final stories that will be featured in the anthology. 
  8. All submissions selected for the anthology may be edited and our edits will be final. We will get in touch with you if this is the case.

28 October 2021: Fair Enough? Towards an anti-discrimination law for Singapore

Maybe you received a bad performance appraisal after announcing your pregnancy at work. Or perhaps you were excluded from important meetings or social events at the office after you came out to a close colleague. Maybe you were even turned down from a job because an employer assumed that your disability would affect your productivity, despite your being an excellent candidate for the role.

If the above situations sound familiar, then you’ve probably encountered some kind of workplace discrimination.

Workplace discrimination takes various forms, both overt and subtle, and likely affects a significant population of workers. To address this, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced in this year’s National Day Rally speech that new legislation will enshrine the existing guidelines from Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP). Under this law, workers will be protected against discrimination on the basis of age, race, religion, gender and disability.

This long-awaited move has been welcomed by employees, employers and advocates alike. At the same time, critical questions remain: What will this anti-discrimination legislation really look like? (What should it look like?) What material difference will it make to the operations of workplaces across Singapore? And how can we ensure that all groups of vulnerable workers will be adequately protected?

Join AWARE, the Disabled People’s Association (DPA), PinkDot and Blackbox on Thursday, 28 October 2021, for a panel discussion on workplace discrimination in Singapore. This discussion will cover a range of topics, including:

  • Findings from a new Blackbox survey on workplace discrimination in Singapore
  • Common forms of workplace discrimination on the grounds of gender, disability and sexual orientation
  • Discrimination protections available to workers in Singapore

If you’re an employee or human resource professional grappling with the above, attend this panel and weigh in on how best to stamp out workplace discrimination in Singapore.

Date: Thursday, October 28 2021

Time: 4pm – 5:30pm

Venue: Zoom

This event is pay-what-you-can. Suggested donation of $5 per head.

Register here!

About the Speakers

Professor Tommy Koh (moderator)

Tommy Koh is currently Professor of Law at NUS; Ambassador-At-Large at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the Rector of the Tembusu College at NUS; Chairman of the Governing Board of the Centre for International Law at the National University of Singapore (NUS) and Special Adviser to IPS. He is the Chairman of the International Advisory Panel of the Asia Research Institute (NUS) and Chairman of the Advisory Committee of the Master’s Degree on Environmental Management (NUS). He is also the Co-chairman of the Asian Development Bank’s Advisory Committee on Water and Sanitation, and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the SymAsia Foundation of Credit Suisse.

He has served as Dean of the Faculty of Law of NUS, Singapore’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York, Ambassador to the United States of America, High Commissioner to Canada and Ambassador to Mexico. He was the UN Secretary General’s Special Envoy to Russia, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Koh was also President of the Third UN Conference on the Law of the Sea, and the Chairman of the Preparatory Committee for and the Main Committee of the UN Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit). Koh was the founding Chairman of the National Arts Council, founding Executive Director of the Asia-Europe Foundation and former Chairman of the National Heritage Board.

Corinna Lim, Executive Director, AWARE

Corinna Lim is the Executive Director of AWARE, the Association of Women for Action and Research. Lim joined AWARE as a member and volunteer in 1992 and has been a women’s rights activist for close to 30 years.

Since becoming Executive Director in 2010, she has been responsible for a range of initiatives including the setting up of the Sexual Assault Care Centre, the only specialised service in Singapore that provides support to sexual assault victims. She also led teams at AWARE to successfully advocate for the enactment of the Protection from Harassment Act, the repeal of marital rape immunity, better access to housing for single parents, gender equal workplaces and greater support for low income families and caregivers of the elderly.

In recognition of her contributions to civil society and the advancement of women’s rights, Lim received a Fulbright Scholarship (1998 – 1999). In 2021, she was appointed as the 8th S R Nathan Fellow for the Study of Singapore by the Institute of Policy Studies.

Cassandra Chiu, Board Member, Disabled People’s Association

Cassandra Chiu is a Singaporean psychotherapist, social advocate and equal opportunity consultant. Chiu is a Director of The Safe Harbour Counselling Centre. Her vision as a person living with blindness is to change what it means to be disabled in Asia for the individual, the community and society at large. Chiu’s work has been published in The Straits Times, Today and the essay collection 50 Years of ASEAN and Singapore. Her first book, about Asian attitudes towards disabilities, was titled A Place for Us and published in March 2019.

Chiu also volunteers at the board level at the Singapore Association of the Visually Handicapped, Disabled People’s Association and K9ASSISTANCE, a charity she founded in 2020 to promote the awareness, understanding and acceptance of all types of Assistance Dogs for the disabled. Chiu is a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, Social Innovation Park Fellow and recipient of The Singapore Woman Award.

Deryne Sim, Spokesperson and Committee Member, Pink Dot

Deryne Sim is a media and entertainment lawyer and an LGBTQ activist. She is part of Pink Dot SG, a social movement which promotes acceptance and equality for LGBTQ people in Singapore. Her portfolio in Pink Dot SG encompasses providing legal advice to the organisation and spearheading Red Dot for Pink Dot, the business networking arm of Pink Dot SG, which conducts fundraising activities for Pink Dot SG and promotes workplace inclusion in Singapore. Additionally, she is a committee member with the Ready4Repeal movement, which advocates for the decriminalisation of homosexuality in Singapore; and a contributor to the Same But Different legal guidebook for LGBTQ+ couples and families in Singapore. In 2021, she was awarded the Fulbright Scholarship and is using it to pursue an LL.M in Law and Sexuality at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Blackbox: Presenting findings from survey on workplace discrimination

David Black, Founder and CEO

David Black is the founder and CEO of Blackbox Research, a decision science solutions company. As the head of Blackbox, David has carried out studies and provided advice across many areas of Singapore public policy as well as worked with many of Singapore’s largest and preeminent institutions. The homegrown company has also had projects commissioned across more than 40 countries globally.

Before moving to Singapore in 2000, David graduated with a Law Degree from the Australian National University and worked for a period in the Australian Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. He also worked as a political speech writer before becoming an election polling specialist working across Australia and New Zealand. David was a recipient of the ASME Entrepreneur of the Year Award in 2019. He is also a contributor and mentor at Advisory, a youth-led non-profit dedicated to empowering young Singaporeans to make informed career and further education choices.

Adelene Ong, Public Policy Research Director

Adelene Ong brings more than a decade of market research experience across the public and private sectors. As a Research Director in the Public Policy team at Blackbox Research, Adelene works with clients from government, NGOs and government-linked corporations to advise on public policy, public service delivery and public communications. In the last six years, she has spearheaded and managed a wide range of public policy research projects for various ministries and statutory boards in Singapore, including Ministry of Trade and Information, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Economic Development Board, Infocomm Media Development Authority and National Council of Social Service. Prior to Blackbox, Adelene held various research positions in globally renowned market research firms such as Kantar, Nielsen and Ipsos. She holds a Bachelor of Science, with a major in Statistics, from National University of Singapore.

Silent spouse abuse – how coercive control is at the heart of family violence

This op-ed was originally published in Channel NewsAsia on October 5 2021.

When Annie* offers an opinion, her husband mocks her: “Wow, you are so smart now, is it?”

He often talks loudly, but if she begins to raise her voice, he gets upset. He discouraged her from looking for work. When she did find a job, he turned up at her workplace and shouted at her. He has had multiple affairs, but he accuses her of cheating on him.

This has been going on for some three decades.

If Maria* has to work late, or if she goes out with her friends, she has to watch the clock closely. She must get home by 11pm – because that’s when her husband will bolt the front door from the inside.

She and their children do not always have Wi-Fi access at home. He decides when it is switched on and off.

He also controls their use of the air-conditioner and other devices in the flat. He sometimes gets violent, so they quietly make do without the aircon or the Wi-Fi.

Tien* is a migrant spouse. Soon after she married her Singapore husband, he stopped talking to her other than to give curt instructions. When her parents sent her money, he confiscated it and gave it to his parents.

She has a job, but he insists that she give all her wages to him. The allowance he gives her is barely enough for their meals. When she was ill, he would not let her see a doctor and told her if she needed medical treatment, she should get it in her home country.

These are just three examples of family violence cases handled by AWARE’s Helpline in 2020 and 2021. There have been many others, particularly as family violence spiked during Singapore’s COVID-19 circuit breakers last year.

Husbands isolating their wives, not letting them see or even communicate with their parents, siblings and friends. Taking away their mobile phones. Going through their text messages and emails. Smashing their work laptops.

Forcing them to stop work. Cancelling their credit and debit cards. Belittling and body-shaming them. Embarrassing them in public.

Telling them what to wear. Managing their movements. Demanding acknowledgement of being right all the time. Controlling every aspect of their lives.

These are not random, unrelated, innocuous behaviours. They add up to a phenomenon called coercive control, which sits at the core of much family violence.

WHAT IS COERCIVE CONTROL?

Coercive control is a pattern of controlling behaviour: Threats, humiliation, intimidation and other demands used to establish power over and to harm, punish or frighten its victims.

It has been called a “strategic form of ongoing oppression and terrorism” that creates a “hostage-like” situation” of “entrapment”, whereby a perpetrator engenders a sort of forced dependence in their victim, subjugating them and limiting their personal liberty.

The man who coined the term, American sociologist and social worker Evan Stark, defined it as “a new conceptual and legal framework for international progress in women’s rights that frames male partner abuse as a crime against autonomy, dignity, equality and liberty.”

Stark estimated that between 60 and 80 per cent of women seeking assistance for abuse experience coercive control.

Coercive control often precedes, or occurs in conjunction with, physical or sexual assault, and can be just as traumatic and harmful – sometimes even more so. Yet for many reasons it is rarely discussed within the context of family or intimate partner violence.

One reason is its insidious subtlety. Many aforementioned behaviours are frequently excused as “normal” jealousies that prove how much a perpetrator loves their partner.

While few people would interpret a punch as an expression of affection, many more might believe a spouse who says he “loves you so much”, he wants you to stay at home all the time.

Sometimes this misunderstanding is shored up by “love-bombing”, or over-the-top demonstrations of affection that serve to manipulate victims.

All this can add up to a situation of crippling stress, anxiety and vulnerability – and a loss of the self.

“He brought me so low, below myself, that the idea of leaving him and having to work myself back up just seemed impossible,” said musician FKA twigs last year about her experience of coercive control at the hands of partner Shia LaBeouf.

RECOGNISING COERCIVE CONTROL AS FAMILY VIOLENCE

Women’s rights organisations around the world have long asked for coercive control to be made a criminal offence. Their advocacy efforts were successful in the United Kingdom.

In 2015, England and Wales legally defined coercive control and made it an offence. Scotland and Northern Ireland have more recently done this too, and similar efforts are being driven elsewhere around the world, reflecting an ongoing paradigm shift in understanding.

Singapore needs to keep up with such a shift. So far, though, we seem to be falling behind.

In early 2020, the Government formed a taskforce to study the issue of family violence in Singapore and to make recommendations to prevent or reduce its occurrence, support victims and rehabilitate perpetrators.

In September, the Taskforce on Family Violence presented its report and made 16 recommendations, all of which are commendable and necessary as we strive to eliminate domestic violence. But while the Taskforce spoke of the need to study “emerging trends” in family violence, the report disappointingly made no mention of coercive control.

While the report recommends for public communication campaigns to “unpack different types of abuse and what they entail, including physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect”, not much was said about the tactics of manipulative emotional abuse and control that often predict physical abuse.

Conceiving of violence as episodic incidents instead of a pattern of behaviours obscures its true nature, confuses victims (who may think “my situation can’t be that bad – at least he doesn’t hit me”) and allows perpetrators to escape accountability.

This traditional narrow view leads the criminal justice system to fragment longstanding patterns into individual interactions to prosecute.

This thinking seeps into the way social workers may approach family violence situations, when the time between outbursts of physical violence is sometimes viewed as a break from violence entirely, and a chance for victims to recuperate – yet other forms of abuse, such as humiliation and isolation, may well continue in that period.

We need publicity campaigns that list the many forms of coercive control so that people can recognise them in a partner. The publicity campaigns should help people realise they do not have to stay in abusive relationships, that there is help and support to get out of these situations.

But we also need recognition in our laws of coercive control so that there is scope for intervention by the authorities.

Without this legal definition of what constitutes coercive control, victims may not feel confident they will be believed if they speak up and seek help, and so they stay trapped, suffering in silence, in their abusive relationships.

HOW TO PREVENT COERCIVE CONTROL

There may be some hesitation to criminalise coercive control because of the challenge of proving it. Much will of course have to depend on the testimony of the victim.

Yet this can be backed up by evidence of controlling and abusive behaviour in emails and phone messages, and by the testimony of family members, friends, colleagues and perhaps also neighbours.

Social workers and police officers will need to be trained to spot tell-tale signs of controlling behaviour in a household and the unspoken messages in a victim’s body language.

Research is needed, and much discussion and debate, before we can come up with a suitable conceptual and legal framework for dealing with emotional abuse and coercive control. It is an effort we must make if we are to get to the heart of family violence and have any hope of one day ending partner abuse.

Our understanding of abusive relationships and what we can and should about them is constantly evolving. It was not long ago the police were powerless to intervene in instances of domestic violence unless there were broken bones or other “grievous hurt”.

As a society, as a judicial system, we were simply blind to the reality of domestic abuse, the shocking violence that goes on behind closed doors.

The Women’s Charter was passed in 1961, but Personal Protection Orders, which today are the first line of defence against family violence, only came about later when the Charter was amended in 1980. And it was only last year, in January 2020, that marital rape became a crime.

The Government will present its White Paper on gender equality early next year. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has indicated that family violence is a key area the paper will cover.

I look forward to proposals that will be today as progressive as the Women’s Charter was when it was first passed in 1961.

I look forward to recognition in the White Paper of the vital importance of understanding and criminalising coercive control.

* Pseudonyms were used in this commentary.

Margaret Thomas, President, AWARE.