-
Advocacy Theme
-
Tags
- Abortion
- Adoption
- Caregiving
- CEDAW
- Disability
- Domestic Violence
- Domestic Workers
- Harassment
- Healthcare
- Housing
- International/Regional Work
- Maintenance
- Media
- Migrant Spouses
- Migrant Workers
- Muslim Law
- National budget
- Parental Leave
- Parenthood
- Polygamy
- Population
- Race and religion
- Sexual Violence
- Sexuality Education
- Single Parents
- Social Support
- Sterilisation
- Women's Charter
Exploring the intersections between gender, ageing and inequality at the Tsao Foundation panel
June 10th, 2025 | Events, News, Older People and Caregiving, Workplace Harassment
Sugidha Nithiananthan (second from the right) standing with fellow panelists at the Population Association of Singapore (PAS) 2025 Annual Meeting on 16 May. Photo courtesy of PAS.
This panel recap was written by the Population Association of Singapore, and was originally published on their website.
The Population Association of Singapore (PAS) held its third annual meeting from 15 to 16 May 2025 on the theme ‘Demography and Inequality: Intersecting Paths.’ As part of this conference, the Tsao Foundation, together with its partners from the Singapore Alliance for Women in Ageing (SAWA) hosted a panel on the theme ‘The Intersections between Gender, Ageing and Inequality’ on 16 May 2025.
The panel aimed to draw attention to how the intersection of gender and age throughout the life course results in gendered inequalities faced by women in old age; and the need for policies that recognise and address the intersection of gender, ageing and inequality.
Focusing on the intersection of gender and age at work, Dr Supriti Bezbaruah (on behalf of Ms Susana Harding, Senior Director, International Longevity Centre Singapore, Tsao Foundation) presented on ‘Ageing and Gender Intersectionality Evidence From a Cross-sectional Study of Mature and Older Singaporean Workers.’ Dr Bezbaruah used data from a survey of mature and older workers conducted by the Tsao Foundation in 2023-2024 that showed that female workers are significantly more likely to report age discrimination at work compared to males. Lower-income, older women (above 50 years) in particular, were most vulnerable to discrimination, underlining how intersections of age, gender and income can compound inequalities. However, no significant gender differences were found in selection and hiring practices. Gender was also not a significant factor influencing improvements in employment outcomes after training. Instead, other factors, such as perceptions of employability and informal learning had a greater impact on employment outcomes. The findings point to a two-fold approach to policy interventions. First, it is essential to address gender and age discrimination at work, through a combination of legislation, changes in workplace practices and cultures, and a focus on changing employer mindsets, among others. Second, training programmes must be paired with policies to address workplace discrimination. Furthermore, as training does not in itself guarantee better employment outcomes, there should be greater emphasis on encouraging informal learning and developing programmes that boost perceptions of ageing and employability. Interventions should focus on improving employment outcomes, not just completing training, which may require providing more tailored training programmes that address the specific needs of older women.
This was followed by a presentation by Ms Sugidha Nithiananthan, Director, Advocacy and Research, Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) on ‘The Lived Experience of Ageing Among Women: A Study on the Impact on Career, Financial Health and Mental Well-Being.’ The presentation outlined some of the main areas of concern of older women in Singapore, in response to the White Paper on Singapore Women’s Development. Ms Nithiananthan explained how the White Paper on Singapore Women’s Development, released in 2022 focused on younger women, and did not include targeted policies or initiatives for older women. In response, to understand older women’s concerns, SAWA held a series of focus group discussions with older women focusing on five core themes: workplace, caregiving, retirement adequacy, health and well-being, and community support and outreach. Based on the insights from the focus group discussions, SAWA presented a series of recommendations in each core area as outlined below.

While the first two presentations focused on the concerns of current cohorts of older women, Ms Koh Yan Ping, CEO, Singapore Council of Women’s Organisations (SCWO) turned the attention to the future, or ‘Tomorrow’s New Old: Singapore’s Future Cohort of Ageing.’ Ms Koh shared the findings of a study conducted by the SCWO on this group of individuals, in their 50s and turning 60-70 in 2030, who are part of the growing sandwich generation of Singaporeans who are simultaneously caring for parents and children. Considering their differing responsibilities and profiles (for instance, they are better educated than previous cohorts), their concerns and needs for old age are also different. The findings showed that Tomorrow’s New Old (TNOs) wished to retire and live independently but wished for more mental and emotional support in later age. They preferred flexible work arrangements and prioritised retirement preparedness and financial independence. Like the previous cohorts of older persons, they were also concerned about ageism at the workplace and wished to have more support and concerted action taken by employers. In terms of living arrangements and caregiving, the study found that TNOs were more open to community care facilities. Consequently, Ms Koh pointed out that policy interventions for the future cohorts of older persons would need to be different, with a greater emphasis on community support (such as community care facilities), support structures for mental and emotional wellbeing, and evolving workplace policies that offer older employees more flexible work arrangements and support for retirement preparedness.
The final presentation by Ms Sabariah Aris, Assistant Director of the PPIS Research & Engagement Department (RED), introduced another dimension to intersectionality through her session titled “Who Gets Left Behind? Understanding Inequality Through the Lens of Gender, Faith, and Ageing.” Ms Aris underscored the knowledge gap on the aspirations of Singapore Muslim women, which limits the development of targeted support initiatives for this group. Drawing on findings from PPIS’ Aspirations of Singapore Muslim Women Research, her presentation examined how the intersecting structures of gender, faith, and age produce cumulative disadvantage among Muslim women in Singapore. From early gendered expectations and caregiving responsibilities to cultural misrecognition and labour market exclusion, these factors intensify over time—culminating in economic insecurity, social isolation, and marginalisation in later life. The study challenges monolithic portrayals of Muslim women by highlighting their faith-aligned aspirations, professional aspirations, and desire for agency and recognition. The study also called for a life course and intersectional approach to social policy, as well as the need to design inclusive systems that reflect the diverse lived realities of those most at risk of being left behind.
The presentations were followed by a panel discussion and open Q&A. The panellists discussed the challenges faced by the ageing population, especially women, in the workplace, the impact of the Workplace Fairness Act and the Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangements (FWAs), and the impact of caregiving responsibilities, particularly for women, on their careers and income and retirement security. The panellists explored the stereotypes and biases that presented challenges for women in the workplace, the need for employers to understand and effectively administer requests for FWAs, the importance of employers embracing and modelling best practices in relation to encouraging both men and women to undertake caregiving responsibilities, including utilising their full paternity leave, what would best motivate employers to take action on ageism and sexism in the workplace, and the role of men in addressing gender inequalities, among other issues. The panel concluded with the observation that these challenges are myriad and complex, and employers need to understand the value brought to their businesses when they address issues of age and sex discrimination in the workplace, and finally, that research and data is needed that verifies this.